Perhaps we can start a page for people to put their name down for this? I couldn't find an Apache wiki site-- is there somewhere the developers think appropriate?
--- A. Soroka Apache Jena / The University of Virginia Library > On Jan 23, 2017, at 12:08 PM, Aaron Coburn <acob...@amherst.edu> wrote: > > I would also be very interested. > > We use the entityhub component quite a bit at our institution, and I would be > happy to be involved. > > Aaron Coburn > > >> On Jan 22, 2017, at 12:30 PM, Antero Duarte <a.fduar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I would definitely be up for that! >> >> On Sat, 21 Jan 2017, 3:33 p.m. A. Soroka, <aj...@virginia.edu> wrote: >> >>> Ditto. If there are other folks who would be interested in participating >>> in something like this, now would be a good time to raise your voice! >>> >>> --- >>> A. Soroka >>> The University of Virginia Library >>> >>> >>>> On Jan 21, 2017, at 10:20 AM, Andrew Valencik <and...@affin.io> wrote: >>>> >>>> I think the "mandatory" documentation contribution is a great idea (and >>>> very reasonable). I'd be happy to partake! >>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:13 AM Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I wouldn't mind to be involved in that but it would be almost >>> "mandatory" >>>>> to contribute some Developer Documentation as outcome of those meetings >>>>> :-). @Rupert we specially need you here :-) >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 4:09 PM A. Soroka <aj...@virginia.edu> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> I agree that the barrier to contribution is very high. I recall having >>>>>> issues with the documentation initially and the only >>>>>>> available book on Stanbol was not sufficient. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If there was renewed interest in bringing on other developers I would >>>>> be >>>>>> interested in investing the time to learn to codebase. >>>>>> >>>>>> I second this! >>>>>> >>>>>> Perhaps (I know it's very difficult to organize synchronous time for a >>>>>> globally-distributed group but perhaps) we could try to organize a boot >>>>>> camp meeting on-line? In other words, those people who (like Andrew and >>>>>> myself) would be willing to contribute as part of a larger effort could >>>>> get >>>>>> some virtual time with one or more committers/PMC members to take an >>>>>> in-depth tour of the system from the developer point of view and hear >>>>> about >>>>>> the outstanding architectural issues, maybe start to figure out points >>> of >>>>>> contribution. >>>>>> >>>>>> I realize this would make a lot of demands on the committers involved, >>>>> but >>>>>> it might be a way to inject some fuel into the effort. >>>>>> >>>>>> Just an idea... >>>>>> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> A. Soroka >>>>>> The University of Virginia Library >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jan 18, 2017, at 9:54 AM, Andrew Valencik <and...@affin.io> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We use Stanbol in production to annotate text with entities as part of >>>>>> some >>>>>>> of our data products. >>>>>>> We do this via the REST API. >>>>>>> Originally we were using the content hub to store all the documents >>> but >>>>>> saw >>>>>>> higher than expected failures. >>>>>>> The entity engines seem a bit more resilient to varying content types >>> / >>>>>>> encoding. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I agree that the barrier to contribution is very high. >>>>>>> I recall having issues with the documentation initially and the only >>>>>>> available book on Stanbol was not sufficient. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If there was renewed interest in bringing on other developers I would >>>>> be >>>>>>> interested in investing the time to learn to codebase. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 5:53 AM Raffaele Palmieri < >>>>>>> raffaele.palmi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dear community, >>>>>>>> we are using 0.12 version with content hub. I find Stanbol very >>>>>> flexible to >>>>>>>> enhance content, specially those unstructured ones. >>>>>>>> For that regards connections with other projects, we have done some >>>>>>>> thoughts about the use with Apache Marmotta with nosql backends for >>>>> big >>>>>>>> data scenarios. Also with Apache Manifold to implement enrichment of >>>>>>>> existent document repositories, that's a common request. >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Raffaele. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2017-01-16 22:41 GMT+01:00 Antero Duarte <a.fduar...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi there, >>>>>>>>> Stanbol is very useful for me! Greatest and easiest tool for us to >>> do >>>>>> NLP >>>>>>>>> and linked data. Has there been any discussion to move towards a >>>>> nosql >>>>>>>>> storage solution, or is solr still the best thing for us? Also, what >>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>> upgrading solr? How much work would be involved in that? Anyway, >>>>> great >>>>>>>>> tool, really hope this doesn't die!!! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> Antero >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, 4:43 p.m. Bertrand Delacretaz, < >>>>>>>>> bdelacre...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> ...I participated >>>>>>>>>>> also in the development of the Java client, so I could take the >>>>>>>>>>> responsibility of bringing that one as well... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> FWIW, I won't be involved in decisions about this as I left the >>>>>>>>>> Stanbol PMC a while ago - I'm just commenting from a community >>> point >>>>>>>>>> of view, as an experienced Apache member. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> A while ago Stanbol was "larger" and more focused on its core, but >>>>> as >>>>>>>>>> its community becomes smaller (IIUC) it's probably good to bring >>>>>>>>>> everyone here, as much as possible, even it it means a slightly >>> less >>>>>>>>>> focused codebase. This can also help recruiting more active >>>>> committers >>>>>>>>>> and PMC members by involving them directly here. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That might make Stanbol more sustainable, as a community of people >>>>> who >>>>>>>>>> need similar functionality. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -Bertrand >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Andrew Valencik >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Data Scientist >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Affinio <http://www.affinio.com> | Twitter < >>>>> http://twitter.com/valencik> >>>>>> | >>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-valencik-472b2aa4> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Discover your personal brand for free with Discovery by Affinio >>>>>>> < >>>>>> >>>>> >>> http://t.sidekickopen36.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJW7t5XZs2zGp1-W3Ljs1C5vfVNRVQJSG056dPwzdmbQgC02?t=http%3A%2F%2Fdiscovery.affinio.com%2F&si=5220160139427840&pi=8070b80d-4591-486c-891e-f9743f8a6c3f >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Andrew Valencik >>>> >>>> Data Scientist >>>> >>>> Affinio <http://www.affinio.com> | Twitter <http://twitter.com/valencik> >>> | >>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-valencik-472b2aa4> >>>> >>>> Discover your personal brand for free with Discovery by Affinio >>>> < >>> http://t.sidekickopen36.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJW7t5XZs2zGp1-W3Ljs1C5vfVNRVQJSG056dPwzdmbQgC02?t=http%3A%2F%2Fdiscovery.affinio.com%2F&si=5220160139427840&pi=8070b80d-4591-486c-891e-f9743f8a6c3f >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >
