Hi, I wouldn't be available next Monday, but maybe we can organize more than one :-). I insist, in order to make any sense out of this we need @Rupert to join these meetings. He is, by far, the most experienced Stanbol developer and the one with the broader knowledge. Please @Rupert, raise your voice man :-)
Cheers, Rafa On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 3:33 PM Michal Krajňanský < michal.krajnan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Mr. Soroka, > > Thank you for quick reply and direct call proposal. It will be my pleasure > to meeting you virtually. > > The suggested time Monday 27th 10AM EST works well, so you may consider it > settled. I will try to get involved also the managing director of our > department located in Brno, Czech Republic, Matej Dusik. > > I am looking forward to having a fruitful discussion. > > Best Regards, > > Michal Krajnansky > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 3:22 PM A. Soroka <aj...@virginia.edu> wrote: > > > We had a few volunteers to begin learning the codebase to take it > forward, > > and willingness from at least some of the current committers to teach, > but > > I think we need a bit more organization! :grin: > > > > I will make a concrete suggestion. Would it be possible to have a video > > call (perhaps with Google Hangout) about this on (just throwing out a > date > > here) this coming week, Monday 27 February, at 10AM EST? > > > > I would be able to attend. I realize that we are a far-flung group, so > I'm > > just throwing out that date to get us started. The most important thing, > of > > course, is to get as many current committers involved as is practical. > > > > --- > > A. Soroka > > The University of Virginia Library > > > > > On Feb 24, 2017, at 8:50 AM, Michal Krajňanský < > > michal.krajnan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Stanbol users, > > > > > > I was wondering, if there were any results of the discussion about the > > > Apache Stanbol future. > > > > > > I work for a R&D team of Konica Minolta Laboratory Europe, and we have > > been > > > using Stanbol enhancement pipeline in our prototypes concerning > > information > > > extraction from unstructured data. > > > > > > We are highly interested in the continuing evolutoin of the Stanbol > > > project, and willing to actively support it. Is here anyone who could > > tell > > > us, what would be a good way to approach the existing Stanbol > > stakeholders, > > > and support the project by active development and possibly via other > > ways? > > > > > > > > > Michal Krajnansky > > > Research Specialist Junior, Konica Minolta Laboratory Europe > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 6:14 PM A. Soroka <aj...@virginia.edu> wrote: > > > > > >> Perhaps we can start a page for people to put their name down for > this? > > I > > >> couldn't find an Apache wiki site-- is there somewhere the developers > > think > > >> appropriate? > > >> > > >> --- > > >> A. Soroka > > >> Apache Jena / The University of Virginia Library > > >> > > >>> On Jan 23, 2017, at 12:08 PM, Aaron Coburn <acob...@amherst.edu> > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> I would also be very interested. > > >>> > > >>> We use the entityhub component quite a bit at our institution, and I > > >> would be happy to be involved. > > >>> > > >>> Aaron Coburn > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>> On Jan 22, 2017, at 12:30 PM, Antero Duarte <a.fduar...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> I would definitely be up for that! > > >>>> > > >>>> On Sat, 21 Jan 2017, 3:33 p.m. A. Soroka, <aj...@virginia.edu> > wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Ditto. If there are other folks who would be interested in > > >> participating > > >>>>> in something like this, now would be a good time to raise your > voice! > > >>>>> > > >>>>> --- > > >>>>> A. Soroka > > >>>>> The University of Virginia Library > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> On Jan 21, 2017, at 10:20 AM, Andrew Valencik <and...@affin.io> > > >> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I think the "mandatory" documentation contribution is a great idea > > >> (and > > >>>>>> very reasonable). I'd be happy to partake! > > >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:13 AM Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I wouldn't mind to be involved in that but it would be almost > > >>>>> "mandatory" > > >>>>>>> to contribute some Developer Documentation as outcome of those > > >> meetings > > >>>>>>> :-). @Rupert we specially need you here :-) > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 4:09 PM A. Soroka <aj...@virginia.edu> > > >> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> I agree that the barrier to contribution is very high. I recall > > >> having > > >>>>>>>> issues with the documentation initially and the only > > >>>>>>>>> available book on Stanbol was not sufficient. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> If there was renewed interest in bringing on other developers I > > >> would > > >>>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>> interested in investing the time to learn to codebase. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> I second this! > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Perhaps (I know it's very difficult to organize synchronous time > > >> for a > > >>>>>>>> globally-distributed group but perhaps) we could try to > organize a > > >> boot > > >>>>>>>> camp meeting on-line? In other words, those people who (like > > Andrew > > >> and > > >>>>>>>> myself) would be willing to contribute as part of a larger > effort > > >> could > > >>>>>>> get > > >>>>>>>> some virtual time with one or more committers/PMC members to > take > > an > > >>>>>>>> in-depth tour of the system from the developer point of view and > > >> hear > > >>>>>>> about > > >>>>>>>> the outstanding architectural issues, maybe start to figure out > > >> points > > >>>>> of > > >>>>>>>> contribution. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> I realize this would make a lot of demands on the committers > > >> involved, > > >>>>>>> but > > >>>>>>>> it might be a way to inject some fuel into the effort. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Just an idea... > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> --- > > >>>>>>>> A. Soroka > > >>>>>>>> The University of Virginia Library > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Jan 18, 2017, at 9:54 AM, Andrew Valencik <and...@affin.io> > > >> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Hello! > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> We use Stanbol in production to annotate text with entities as > > >> part of > > >>>>>>>> some > > >>>>>>>>> of our data products. > > >>>>>>>>> We do this via the REST API. > > >>>>>>>>> Originally we were using the content hub to store all the > > documents > > >>>>> but > > >>>>>>>> saw > > >>>>>>>>> higher than expected failures. > > >>>>>>>>> The entity engines seem a bit more resilient to varying content > > >> types > > >>>>> / > > >>>>>>>>> encoding. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> I agree that the barrier to contribution is very high. > > >>>>>>>>> I recall having issues with the documentation initially and the > > >> only > > >>>>>>>>> available book on Stanbol was not sufficient. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> If there was renewed interest in bringing on other developers I > > >> would > > >>>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>>> interested in investing the time to learn to codebase. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks! > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 5:53 AM Raffaele Palmieri < > > >>>>>>>>> raffaele.palmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Dear community, > > >>>>>>>>>> we are using 0.12 version with content hub. I find Stanbol > very > > >>>>>>>> flexible to > > >>>>>>>>>> enhance content, specially those unstructured ones. > > >>>>>>>>>> For that regards connections with other projects, we have done > > >> some > > >>>>>>>>>> thoughts about the use with Apache Marmotta with nosql > backends > > >> for > > >>>>>>> big > > >>>>>>>>>> data scenarios. Also with Apache Manifold to implement > > enrichment > > >> of > > >>>>>>>>>> existent document repositories, that's a common request. > > >>>>>>>>>> Regards, > > >>>>>>>>>> Raffaele. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> 2017-01-16 22:41 GMT+01:00 Antero Duarte < > a.fduar...@gmail.com > > >: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi there, > > >>>>>>>>>>> Stanbol is very useful for me! Greatest and easiest tool for > us > > >> to > > >>>>> do > > >>>>>>>> NLP > > >>>>>>>>>>> and linked data. Has there been any discussion to move > towards > > a > > >>>>>>> nosql > > >>>>>>>>>>> storage solution, or is solr still the best thing for us? > Also, > > >> what > > >>>>>>>>>> about > > >>>>>>>>>>> upgrading solr? How much work would be involved in that? > > Anyway, > > >>>>>>> great > > >>>>>>>>>>> tool, really hope this doesn't die!!! > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > > >>>>>>>>>>> Antero > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, 4:43 p.m. Bertrand Delacretaz, < > > >>>>>>>>>>> bdelacre...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Rafa Haro < > rh...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ...I participated > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> also in the development of the Java client, so I could take > > the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> responsibility of bringing that one as well... > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> FWIW, I won't be involved in decisions about this as I left > > the > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Stanbol PMC a while ago - I'm just commenting from a > community > > >>>>> point > > >>>>>>>>>>>> of view, as an experienced Apache member. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> A while ago Stanbol was "larger" and more focused on its > core, > > >> but > > >>>>>>> as > > >>>>>>>>>>>> its community becomes smaller (IIUC) it's probably good to > > bring > > >>>>>>>>>>>> everyone here, as much as possible, even it it means a > > slightly > > >>>>> less > > >>>>>>>>>>>> focused codebase. This can also help recruiting more active > > >>>>>>> committers > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and PMC members by involving them directly here. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> That might make Stanbol more sustainable, as a community of > > >> people > > >>>>>>> who > > >>>>>>>>>>>> need similar functionality. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> -Bertrand > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Andrew Valencik > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Data Scientist > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Affinio <http://www.affinio.com> | Twitter < > > >>>>>>> http://twitter.com/valencik> > > >>>>>>>> | > > >>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-valencik-472b2aa4 > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Discover your personal brand for free with Discovery by Affinio > > >>>>>>>>> < > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >> > > > http://t.sidekickopen36.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJW7t5XZs2zGp1-W3Ljs1C5vfVNRVQJSG056dPwzdmbQgC02?t=http%3A%2F%2Fdiscovery.affinio.com%2F&si=5220160139427840&pi=8070b80d-4591-486c-891e-f9743f8a6c3f > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> -- > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Andrew Valencik > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Data Scientist > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Affinio <http://www.affinio.com> | Twitter < > > >> http://twitter.com/valencik> > > >>>>> | > > >>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-valencik-472b2aa4> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Discover your personal brand for free with Discovery by Affinio > > >>>>>> < > > >>>>> > > >> > > > http://t.sidekickopen36.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJW7t5XZs2zGp1-W3Ljs1C5vfVNRVQJSG056dPwzdmbQgC02?t=http%3A%2F%2Fdiscovery.affinio.com%2F&si=5220160139427840&pi=8070b80d-4591-486c-891e-f9743f8a6c3f > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
