Yes, it would certainly be best to have more than one opportunity, with such a global group. If you are not available on Monday, Rafa, let's not push for that date. Let's find a date to start with that is good for both you and Rupert.
Rupert? --- A. Soroka The University of Virginia Library > On Feb 24, 2017, at 10:00 AM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > I wouldn't be available next Monday, but maybe we can organize more than > one :-). I insist, in order to make any sense out of this we need @Rupert > to join these meetings. He is, by far, the most experienced Stanbol > developer and the one with the broader knowledge. Please @Rupert, raise > your voice man :-) > > Cheers, > Rafa > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 3:33 PM Michal Krajňanský < > michal.krajnan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Mr. Soroka, >> >> Thank you for quick reply and direct call proposal. It will be my pleasure >> to meeting you virtually. >> >> The suggested time Monday 27th 10AM EST works well, so you may consider it >> settled. I will try to get involved also the managing director of our >> department located in Brno, Czech Republic, Matej Dusik. >> >> I am looking forward to having a fruitful discussion. >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Michal Krajnansky >> >> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 3:22 PM A. Soroka <aj...@virginia.edu> wrote: >> >>> We had a few volunteers to begin learning the codebase to take it >> forward, >>> and willingness from at least some of the current committers to teach, >> but >>> I think we need a bit more organization! :grin: >>> >>> I will make a concrete suggestion. Would it be possible to have a video >>> call (perhaps with Google Hangout) about this on (just throwing out a >> date >>> here) this coming week, Monday 27 February, at 10AM EST? >>> >>> I would be able to attend. I realize that we are a far-flung group, so >> I'm >>> just throwing out that date to get us started. The most important thing, >> of >>> course, is to get as many current committers involved as is practical. >>> >>> --- >>> A. Soroka >>> The University of Virginia Library >>> >>>> On Feb 24, 2017, at 8:50 AM, Michal Krajňanský < >>> michal.krajnan...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Dear Stanbol users, >>>> >>>> I was wondering, if there were any results of the discussion about the >>>> Apache Stanbol future. >>>> >>>> I work for a R&D team of Konica Minolta Laboratory Europe, and we have >>> been >>>> using Stanbol enhancement pipeline in our prototypes concerning >>> information >>>> extraction from unstructured data. >>>> >>>> We are highly interested in the continuing evolutoin of the Stanbol >>>> project, and willing to actively support it. Is here anyone who could >>> tell >>>> us, what would be a good way to approach the existing Stanbol >>> stakeholders, >>>> and support the project by active development and possibly via other >>> ways? >>>> >>>> >>>> Michal Krajnansky >>>> Research Specialist Junior, Konica Minolta Laboratory Europe >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 6:14 PM A. Soroka <aj...@virginia.edu> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Perhaps we can start a page for people to put their name down for >> this? >>> I >>>>> couldn't find an Apache wiki site-- is there somewhere the developers >>> think >>>>> appropriate? >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> A. Soroka >>>>> Apache Jena / The University of Virginia Library >>>>> >>>>>> On Jan 23, 2017, at 12:08 PM, Aaron Coburn <acob...@amherst.edu> >>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I would also be very interested. >>>>>> >>>>>> We use the entityhub component quite a bit at our institution, and I >>>>> would be happy to be involved. >>>>>> >>>>>> Aaron Coburn >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jan 22, 2017, at 12:30 PM, Antero Duarte <a.fduar...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would definitely be up for that! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, 21 Jan 2017, 3:33 p.m. A. Soroka, <aj...@virginia.edu> >> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ditto. If there are other folks who would be interested in >>>>> participating >>>>>>>> in something like this, now would be a good time to raise your >> voice! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> A. Soroka >>>>>>>> The University of Virginia Library >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Jan 21, 2017, at 10:20 AM, Andrew Valencik <and...@affin.io> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I think the "mandatory" documentation contribution is a great idea >>>>> (and >>>>>>>>> very reasonable). I'd be happy to partake! >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:13 AM Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I wouldn't mind to be involved in that but it would be almost >>>>>>>> "mandatory" >>>>>>>>>> to contribute some Developer Documentation as outcome of those >>>>> meetings >>>>>>>>>> :-). @Rupert we specially need you here :-) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 4:09 PM A. Soroka <aj...@virginia.edu> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I agree that the barrier to contribution is very high. I recall >>>>> having >>>>>>>>>>> issues with the documentation initially and the only >>>>>>>>>>>> available book on Stanbol was not sufficient. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> If there was renewed interest in bringing on other developers I >>>>> would >>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>> interested in investing the time to learn to codebase. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I second this! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps (I know it's very difficult to organize synchronous time >>>>> for a >>>>>>>>>>> globally-distributed group but perhaps) we could try to >> organize a >>>>> boot >>>>>>>>>>> camp meeting on-line? In other words, those people who (like >>> Andrew >>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>> myself) would be willing to contribute as part of a larger >> effort >>>>> could >>>>>>>>>> get >>>>>>>>>>> some virtual time with one or more committers/PMC members to >> take >>> an >>>>>>>>>>> in-depth tour of the system from the developer point of view and >>>>> hear >>>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>>> the outstanding architectural issues, maybe start to figure out >>>>> points >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>> contribution. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I realize this would make a lot of demands on the committers >>>>> involved, >>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>> it might be a way to inject some fuel into the effort. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Just an idea... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>> A. Soroka >>>>>>>>>>> The University of Virginia Library >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 18, 2017, at 9:54 AM, Andrew Valencik <and...@affin.io> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We use Stanbol in production to annotate text with entities as >>>>> part of >>>>>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>>> of our data products. >>>>>>>>>>>> We do this via the REST API. >>>>>>>>>>>> Originally we were using the content hub to store all the >>> documents >>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>> saw >>>>>>>>>>>> higher than expected failures. >>>>>>>>>>>> The entity engines seem a bit more resilient to varying content >>>>> types >>>>>>>> / >>>>>>>>>>>> encoding. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I agree that the barrier to contribution is very high. >>>>>>>>>>>> I recall having issues with the documentation initially and the >>>>> only >>>>>>>>>>>> available book on Stanbol was not sufficient. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> If there was renewed interest in bringing on other developers I >>>>> would >>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>> interested in investing the time to learn to codebase. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 5:53 AM Raffaele Palmieri < >>>>>>>>>>>> raffaele.palmi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear community, >>>>>>>>>>>>> we are using 0.12 version with content hub. I find Stanbol >> very >>>>>>>>>>> flexible to >>>>>>>>>>>>> enhance content, specially those unstructured ones. >>>>>>>>>>>>> For that regards connections with other projects, we have done >>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>>>> thoughts about the use with Apache Marmotta with nosql >> backends >>>>> for >>>>>>>>>> big >>>>>>>>>>>>> data scenarios. Also with Apache Manifold to implement >>> enrichment >>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>> existent document repositories, that's a common request. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Raffaele. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-01-16 22:41 GMT+01:00 Antero Duarte < >> a.fduar...@gmail.com >>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi there, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stanbol is very useful for me! Greatest and easiest tool for >> us >>>>> to >>>>>>>> do >>>>>>>>>>> NLP >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and linked data. Has there been any discussion to move >> towards >>> a >>>>>>>>>> nosql >>>>>>>>>>>>>> storage solution, or is solr still the best thing for us? >> Also, >>>>> what >>>>>>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>>>>>> upgrading solr? How much work would be involved in that? >>> Anyway, >>>>>>>>>> great >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tool, really hope this doesn't die!!! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Antero >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, 4:43 p.m. Bertrand Delacretaz, < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bdelacre...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Rafa Haro < >> rh...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...I participated >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also in the development of the Java client, so I could take >>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> responsibility of bringing that one as well... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FWIW, I won't be involved in decisions about this as I left >>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stanbol PMC a while ago - I'm just commenting from a >> community >>>>>>>> point >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of view, as an experienced Apache member. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A while ago Stanbol was "larger" and more focused on its >> core, >>>>> but >>>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its community becomes smaller (IIUC) it's probably good to >>> bring >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everyone here, as much as possible, even it it means a >>> slightly >>>>>>>> less >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> focused codebase. This can also help recruiting more active >>>>>>>>>> committers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and PMC members by involving them directly here. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That might make Stanbol more sustainable, as a community of >>>>> people >>>>>>>>>> who >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need similar functionality. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Bertrand >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew Valencik >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Data Scientist >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Affinio <http://www.affinio.com> | Twitter < >>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/valencik> >>>>>>>>>>> | >>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-valencik-472b2aa4 >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Discover your personal brand for free with Discovery by Affinio >>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> http://t.sidekickopen36.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJW7t5XZs2zGp1-W3Ljs1C5vfVNRVQJSG056dPwzdmbQgC02?t=http%3A%2F%2Fdiscovery.affinio.com%2F&si=5220160139427840&pi=8070b80d-4591-486c-891e-f9743f8a6c3f >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Andrew Valencik >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Data Scientist >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Affinio <http://www.affinio.com> | Twitter < >>>>> http://twitter.com/valencik> >>>>>>>> | >>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-valencik-472b2aa4> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Discover your personal brand for free with Discovery by Affinio >>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> http://t.sidekickopen36.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJW7t5XZs2zGp1-W3Ljs1C5vfVNRVQJSG056dPwzdmbQgC02?t=http%3A%2F%2Fdiscovery.affinio.com%2F&si=5220160139427840&pi=8070b80d-4591-486c-891e-f9743f8a6c3f >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>
