Hi Furkan, I have merged your PRs. Thanks again
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 7:26 PM Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Furkan, > > Sorry I didn't. This weekend is probably a good time for me. Will review > and eventually merge them before next Monday > > Thanks! > El El jue, 29 nov 2018 a las 17:48, Furkan KAMACI <furkankam...@gmail.com> > escribió: > >> Hi Rafa, >> >> Did you have a chance to check my PRs? >> >> Kind Regards, >> Furkan KAMACI >> >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 11:51 AM Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi Furkan, >>> >>> Thanks! I will take a look ASAP in order to get them merged >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Rafa >>> >>> On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 9:40 PM Furkan KAMACI <furkankam...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > I've just created STANBOL-1473, STANBOL-1474, STANBOL-1475 and >>> STANBOL-1476 >>> > and created PRs for them! >>> > >>> > Kind Regards, >>> > Furkan KAMACI >>> > >>> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 5:39 PM Furkan KAMACI <furkankam...@gmail.com> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > > Hi Rafa & Roman, >>> > > >>> > > I've already contributed to Apache Stanbol with my 15 issues. You can >>> > > check them from here: >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20Stanbol%20AND%20reporter%20%3D%20kamaci%20 >>> > > >>> > > @Rafa I'll check backlog and also file new issues to keep my >>> > contribution. >>> > > >>> > > @Roman I believe that Apache Stanbol has a great future and I'll try >>> to >>> > > contribute its source code and improve its community as much as I >>> can. >>> > > >>> > > Kind Regards, >>> > > Furkan KAMACI >>> > > >>> > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 5:37 AM Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > >> Hi Everyone, >>> > >> >>> > >> top-posting here to summarize a month worth of this thread: >>> > >> 1. it sounds like there's still interest in keeping Stanbol alive >>> > >> 2. it sounds like at least Phillip Rhodes, Dileepa Jayakody and >>> > >> Rafa Haro are enthusiastic enough about Stanbol's future >>> > >> and are willing to invest some amount of their time into it. >>> > >> >>> > >> Hence, I'd like to propose that we start a formal PMC vote on adding >>> > >> these >>> > >> individuals to the PMC in the hope that this will help to >>> revitalize the >>> > >> project. >>> > >> >>> > >> If there are no objections -- I'm going to start a PMC vote thread >>> over >>> > >> the >>> > >> weekend. >>> > >> >>> > >> Thanks, >>> > >> Roman. >>> > >> >>> > >> On 2018/10/25 02:50:03, Phillip Rhodes <motley.crue....@gmail.com> >>> > >> wrote: >>> > >> > Hey guys, I'm definitely still very interested in Stanbol and >>> would >>> > >> > like to see it remain an active project here at ASF. I haven't >>> had >>> > >> > much opportunity to contribute up to this point, but I remain >>> > >> > committed to getting more deeply involved and starting to >>> contribute. >>> > >> > It's hard to commit to a specific level or a specific timeline, >>> but I >>> > >> > can say that my plan is definitely to try and get equipped to >>> start >>> > >> > contributing to Stanbol. >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > Phil >>> > >> > ~~~ >>> > >> > This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM >>> > >> > >>> > >> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:48 AM Dileepa Jayakody >>> > >> > <dileepajayak...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > Hi Roman, Rafa and fellow Stanbolers. >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > I'm Dileepa Jayakody, a committer of Apache Stanbol project >>> since >>> > >> 2014. >>> > >> > > While I was engaging in the dev list and development of the >>> project >>> > >> for >>> > >> > > couple of years, due to other engagements, I must admit my >>> > >> contributions >>> > >> > > have been very low since. >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > However, I think there is a lot we can do to revive the project. >>> > >> > > Looking at the Jira tracker[1] I think we can start by fixing >>> the >>> > >> bugs and >>> > >> > > work towards a new release. Would love to see Stanbol active >>> again, >>> > >> and see >>> > >> > > the senior developers back on the list :) >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > I will start to engage again as much as possible. >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > Thanks, >>> > >> > > Dileepa >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/STANBOL/summary >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:15 PM Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > > Hi Roman, >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > I'm Rafa Haro, current PMC member of Apache Stanbol. I think >>> we >>> > have >>> > >> > > > discussed this situation a couple of times in the past few >>> months. >>> > >> There >>> > >> > > > were a similar inquiry recently and back then, at least 3 >>> "active" >>> > >> > > > (including me) PMC members responded with similar answers: we >>> > would >>> > >> be >>> > >> > > > somehow available for bug fixing, attend the mailing lists >>> and so >>> > >> on but, >>> > >> > > > because of lack of time, further contributions like working >>> on the >>> > >> backlog, >>> > >> > > > community development....had to be eventually abandoned. I >>> think >>> > >> this >>> > >> > > > situation is extensible to most of current committers. Within >>> the >>> > >> same >>> > >> > > > threads, there were Stanbol's users that were interesting in >>> > taking >>> > >> the >>> > >> > > > project out of this "blockage" but the reality is that this >>> > >> situation has >>> > >> > > > remained the same for months and the activity at the mailing >>> lists >>> > >> is >>> > >> > > > minimum. So maybe yeah, probably it is a shame and maybe it is >>> > time >>> > >> to >>> > >> > > > archive the project. >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > I'm not sure which are the implications of putting the project >>> > into >>> > >> the >>> > >> > > > Attic from the organisation point of view, but in my honest >>> > opinion >>> > >> it is >>> > >> > > > that or, somehow, I don't know exactly how, try to find or >>> extend >>> > >> the >>> > >> > > > community with new members interested in further improvements >>> and >>> > >> uses >>> > >> > > > cases around Stanbol that could lead to resurrect the project. >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > Warm regards from Seville >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 3:15 AM Roman Shaposhnik < >>> r...@apache.org> >>> > >> wrote: >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > > On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 9:47 AM Roman Shaposhnik < >>> r...@apache.org >>> > > >>> > >> wrote: >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > Hi! >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > a few months ago Shane Curcuru started this discussion >>> > >> > > > > > around the level of PMC activity in the project: >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> >>> > >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7f85aecc5180b85d888cf63a8136521739e5e1ee74ae167abd3ab9ff@%3Cdev.stanbol.apache.org%3E >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > at the time it seemed like the consensus was: there's >>> > >> > > > > > enough folks interested in at least overseeing mechanics >>> > >> > > > > > of the PMC. However if a few months since it would seem >>> > >> > > > > > that we're back to where Shane's discussion started. >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > Now, this is, of course, based on my cursory review of >>> mailing >>> > >> > > > > > list and JIRA activity, but it seems that out of the >>> current >>> > 22 >>> > >> PMC >>> > >> > > > > > members only one or two are active (and I don't mean >>> writing >>> > >> > > > > > code active, but at least supporting "mechanics" of the >>> PMC): >>> > >> > > > > > http://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?pmc=stanbol >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > I'm wondering, perhaps, if it would benefit the project to >>> > >> consider >>> > >> > > > > > expanding the PMC to include the other 4 committers and/or >>> > >> > > > > > some of the project's active users. >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > Thoughts? >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > > > Hi Again! >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > > > it seems that there hasn't been much of a feedback on this >>> > thread >>> > >> so >>> > >> > > > > I'm expanding it to users@ as well. >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > > > The concern here is that unless the community comes up with >>> at >>> > >> least 3 >>> > >> > > > > reasonably active PMC >>> > >> > > > > members to make sure that the project can continue it may >>> be end >>> > >> up >>> > >> > > > > "archived" into Apache Attic. >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > > > Now, these PMC members do NOT have to be existing PMC >>> members, >>> > if >>> > >> > > > > there's enough enthusiastic >>> > >> > > > > folks in the user community we can definitely look into >>> > >> "rebooting" >>> > >> > > > > the PMC that way. >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > > > If anybody is interested in making sure that Stanbol >>> continues >>> > as >>> > >> an >>> > >> > > > > active Apache project -- please >>> > >> > > > > reply to this thread. >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > > > Thanks, >>> > >> > > > > Roman. >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > >>> >>
