Hi, I've just created STANBOL-1473, STANBOL-1474, STANBOL-1475 and STANBOL-1476 and created PRs for them!
Kind Regards, Furkan KAMACI On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 5:39 PM Furkan KAMACI <furkankam...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Rafa & Roman, > > I've already contributed to Apache Stanbol with my 15 issues. You can > check them from here: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20Stanbol%20AND%20reporter%20%3D%20kamaci%20 > > @Rafa I'll check backlog and also file new issues to keep my contribution. > > @Roman I believe that Apache Stanbol has a great future and I'll try to > contribute its source code and improve its community as much as I can. > > Kind Regards, > Furkan KAMACI > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 5:37 AM Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi Everyone, >> >> top-posting here to summarize a month worth of this thread: >> 1. it sounds like there's still interest in keeping Stanbol alive >> 2. it sounds like at least Phillip Rhodes, Dileepa Jayakody and >> Rafa Haro are enthusiastic enough about Stanbol's future >> and are willing to invest some amount of their time into it. >> >> Hence, I'd like to propose that we start a formal PMC vote on adding >> these >> individuals to the PMC in the hope that this will help to revitalize the >> project. >> >> If there are no objections -- I'm going to start a PMC vote thread over >> the >> weekend. >> >> Thanks, >> Roman. >> >> On 2018/10/25 02:50:03, Phillip Rhodes <motley.crue....@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Hey guys, I'm definitely still very interested in Stanbol and would >> > like to see it remain an active project here at ASF. I haven't had >> > much opportunity to contribute up to this point, but I remain >> > committed to getting more deeply involved and starting to contribute. >> > It's hard to commit to a specific level or a specific timeline, but I >> > can say that my plan is definitely to try and get equipped to start >> > contributing to Stanbol. >> > >> > >> > Phil >> > ~~~ >> > This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:48 AM Dileepa Jayakody >> > <dileepajayak...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > Hi Roman, Rafa and fellow Stanbolers. >> > > >> > > I'm Dileepa Jayakody, a committer of Apache Stanbol project since >> 2014. >> > > While I was engaging in the dev list and development of the project >> for >> > > couple of years, due to other engagements, I must admit my >> contributions >> > > have been very low since. >> > > >> > > However, I think there is a lot we can do to revive the project. >> > > Looking at the Jira tracker[1] I think we can start by fixing the >> bugs and >> > > work towards a new release. Would love to see Stanbol active again, >> and see >> > > the senior developers back on the list :) >> > > >> > > I will start to engage again as much as possible. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Dileepa >> > > >> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/STANBOL/summary >> > > >> > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:15 PM Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi Roman, >> > > > >> > > > I'm Rafa Haro, current PMC member of Apache Stanbol. I think we have >> > > > discussed this situation a couple of times in the past few months. >> There >> > > > were a similar inquiry recently and back then, at least 3 "active" >> > > > (including me) PMC members responded with similar answers: we would >> be >> > > > somehow available for bug fixing, attend the mailing lists and so >> on but, >> > > > because of lack of time, further contributions like working on the >> backlog, >> > > > community development....had to be eventually abandoned. I think >> this >> > > > situation is extensible to most of current committers. Within the >> same >> > > > threads, there were Stanbol's users that were interesting in taking >> the >> > > > project out of this "blockage" but the reality is that this >> situation has >> > > > remained the same for months and the activity at the mailing lists >> is >> > > > minimum. So maybe yeah, probably it is a shame and maybe it is time >> to >> > > > archive the project. >> > > > >> > > > I'm not sure which are the implications of putting the project into >> the >> > > > Attic from the organisation point of view, but in my honest opinion >> it is >> > > > that or, somehow, I don't know exactly how, try to find or extend >> the >> > > > community with new members interested in further improvements and >> uses >> > > > cases around Stanbol that could lead to resurrect the project. >> > > > >> > > > Warm regards from Seville >> > > > >> > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 3:15 AM Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 9:47 AM Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Hi! >> > > > > > >> > > > > > a few months ago Shane Curcuru started this discussion >> > > > > > around the level of PMC activity in the project: >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7f85aecc5180b85d888cf63a8136521739e5e1ee74ae167abd3ab9ff@%3Cdev.stanbol.apache.org%3E >> > > > > > >> > > > > > at the time it seemed like the consensus was: there's >> > > > > > enough folks interested in at least overseeing mechanics >> > > > > > of the PMC. However if a few months since it would seem >> > > > > > that we're back to where Shane's discussion started. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Now, this is, of course, based on my cursory review of mailing >> > > > > > list and JIRA activity, but it seems that out of the current 22 >> PMC >> > > > > > members only one or two are active (and I don't mean writing >> > > > > > code active, but at least supporting "mechanics" of the PMC): >> > > > > > http://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?pmc=stanbol >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I'm wondering, perhaps, if it would benefit the project to >> consider >> > > > > > expanding the PMC to include the other 4 committers and/or >> > > > > > some of the project's active users. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Thoughts? >> > > > > >> > > > > Hi Again! >> > > > > >> > > > > it seems that there hasn't been much of a feedback on this thread >> so >> > > > > I'm expanding it to users@ as well. >> > > > > >> > > > > The concern here is that unless the community comes up with at >> least 3 >> > > > > reasonably active PMC >> > > > > members to make sure that the project can continue it may be end >> up >> > > > > "archived" into Apache Attic. >> > > > > >> > > > > Now, these PMC members do NOT have to be existing PMC members, if >> > > > > there's enough enthusiastic >> > > > > folks in the user community we can definitely look into >> "rebooting" >> > > > > the PMC that way. >> > > > > >> > > > > If anybody is interested in making sure that Stanbol continues as >> an >> > > > > active Apache project -- please >> > > > > reply to this thread. >> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > Roman. >> > > > > >> > > > >> > >> >
