Hi Furkan, Glad to hear that. Is there any specific open task that you want to start addressing or any proposal for the backlog?
Cheers, Rafa On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 5:12 AM Muhammad Sajjad <muhammad.saj...@kics.edu.pk> wrote: > yes of course. > > On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 10:26 AM Furkan KAMACI <furkankam...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I'm *Furkan KAMACI* who is a person loves open source, Java, and Machine > > Learning. I'm Committer and PMC member of Apache Gora, Apache Nutch, and > > Committer of Apache ManifoldCF and also a member of The Apache Software > > Foundation. > > > > I've developed software and managed teams which creates products on > > analyzing Petabytes of data to run efficient Machine Learning and Search > > algorithms on Big Data. I have a work experience +10 years including > > companies as like Alcatel-Lucent/Nokia and has an academical background. > > Currently, I have a company named as LAGOM which works on Big Data and > > Machine Learning and contributes to open source projects. > > > > I've contributed to many ASF projects throughout the years including > Gora, > > ManifoldCF, Nutch, Solr/Lucene and of course *Stanbol*. I was a GSoC > > student for Stanbol 4 years ago but I couldn't deep into dive with > Stanbol > > due to my health problems. > > > > I would like to take responsibility and contribute to *Apache Stanbol* > as a > > Committer/PMC. > > > > PS: My Apache and GitHub id is *kamaci*. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Furkan KAMACI > > > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 5:50 AM Phillip Rhodes < > motley.crue....@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hey guys, I'm definitely still very interested in Stanbol and would > > > like to see it remain an active project here at ASF. I haven't had > > > much opportunity to contribute up to this point, but I remain > > > committed to getting more deeply involved and starting to contribute. > > > It's hard to commit to a specific level or a specific timeline, but I > > > can say that my plan is definitely to try and get equipped to start > > > contributing to Stanbol. > > > > > > > > > Phil > > > ~~~ > > > This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:48 AM Dileepa Jayakody > > > <dileepajayak...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Roman, Rafa and fellow Stanbolers. > > > > > > > > I'm Dileepa Jayakody, a committer of Apache Stanbol project since > 2014. > > > > While I was engaging in the dev list and development of the project > for > > > > couple of years, due to other engagements, I must admit my > > contributions > > > > have been very low since. > > > > > > > > However, I think there is a lot we can do to revive the project. > > > > Looking at the Jira tracker[1] I think we can start by fixing the > bugs > > > and > > > > work towards a new release. Would love to see Stanbol active again, > and > > > see > > > > the senior developers back on the list :) > > > > > > > > I will start to engage again as much as possible. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Dileepa > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/STANBOL/summary > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:15 PM Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Roman, > > > > > > > > > > I'm Rafa Haro, current PMC member of Apache Stanbol. I think we > have > > > > > discussed this situation a couple of times in the past few months. > > > There > > > > > were a similar inquiry recently and back then, at least 3 "active" > > > > > (including me) PMC members responded with similar answers: we would > > be > > > > > somehow available for bug fixing, attend the mailing lists and so > on > > > but, > > > > > because of lack of time, further contributions like working on the > > > backlog, > > > > > community development....had to be eventually abandoned. I think > this > > > > > situation is extensible to most of current committers. Within the > > same > > > > > threads, there were Stanbol's users that were interesting in taking > > the > > > > > project out of this "blockage" but the reality is that this > situation > > > has > > > > > remained the same for months and the activity at the mailing lists > is > > > > > minimum. So maybe yeah, probably it is a shame and maybe it is time > > to > > > > > archive the project. > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure which are the implications of putting the project into > > the > > > > > Attic from the organisation point of view, but in my honest opinion > > it > > > is > > > > > that or, somehow, I don't know exactly how, try to find or extend > the > > > > > community with new members interested in further improvements and > > uses > > > > > cases around Stanbol that could lead to resurrect the project. > > > > > > > > > > Warm regards from Seville > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 3:15 AM Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 9:47 AM Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a few months ago Shane Curcuru started this discussion > > > > > > > around the level of PMC activity in the project: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7f85aecc5180b85d888cf63a8136521739e5e1ee74ae167abd3ab9ff@%3Cdev.stanbol.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > > > > > > at the time it seemed like the consensus was: there's > > > > > > > enough folks interested in at least overseeing mechanics > > > > > > > of the PMC. However if a few months since it would seem > > > > > > > that we're back to where Shane's discussion started. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, this is, of course, based on my cursory review of mailing > > > > > > > list and JIRA activity, but it seems that out of the current 22 > > PMC > > > > > > > members only one or two are active (and I don't mean writing > > > > > > > code active, but at least supporting "mechanics" of the PMC): > > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?pmc=stanbol > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm wondering, perhaps, if it would benefit the project to > > consider > > > > > > > expanding the PMC to include the other 4 committers and/or > > > > > > > some of the project's active users. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Again! > > > > > > > > > > > > it seems that there hasn't been much of a feedback on this thread > > so > > > > > > I'm expanding it to users@ as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > The concern here is that unless the community comes up with at > > least > > > 3 > > > > > > reasonably active PMC > > > > > > members to make sure that the project can continue it may be end > up > > > > > > "archived" into Apache Attic. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, these PMC members do NOT have to be existing PMC members, if > > > > > > there's enough enthusiastic > > > > > > folks in the user community we can definitely look into > "rebooting" > > > > > > the PMC that way. > > > > > > > > > > > > If anybody is interested in making sure that Stanbol continues as > > an > > > > > > active Apache project -- please > > > > > > reply to this thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Roman. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
