Hi Rafa & Roman, I've already contributed to Apache Stanbol with my 15 issues. You can check them from here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20Stanbol%20AND%20reporter%20%3D%20kamaci%20 @Rafa I'll check backlog and also file new issues to keep my contribution. @Roman I believe that Apache Stanbol has a great future and I'll try to contribute its source code and improve its community as much as I can. Kind Regards, Furkan KAMACI On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 5:37 AM Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > top-posting here to summarize a month worth of this thread: > 1. it sounds like there's still interest in keeping Stanbol alive > 2. it sounds like at least Phillip Rhodes, Dileepa Jayakody and > Rafa Haro are enthusiastic enough about Stanbol's future > and are willing to invest some amount of their time into it. > > Hence, I'd like to propose that we start a formal PMC vote on adding these > individuals to the PMC in the hope that this will help to revitalize the > project. > > If there are no objections -- I'm going to start a PMC vote thread over the > weekend. > > Thanks, > Roman. > > On 2018/10/25 02:50:03, Phillip Rhodes <motley.crue....@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hey guys, I'm definitely still very interested in Stanbol and would > > like to see it remain an active project here at ASF. I haven't had > > much opportunity to contribute up to this point, but I remain > > committed to getting more deeply involved and starting to contribute. > > It's hard to commit to a specific level or a specific timeline, but I > > can say that my plan is definitely to try and get equipped to start > > contributing to Stanbol. > > > > > > Phil > > ~~~ > > This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM > > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:48 AM Dileepa Jayakody > > <dileepajayak...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Roman, Rafa and fellow Stanbolers. > > > > > > I'm Dileepa Jayakody, a committer of Apache Stanbol project since 2014. > > > While I was engaging in the dev list and development of the project for > > > couple of years, due to other engagements, I must admit my > contributions > > > have been very low since. > > > > > > However, I think there is a lot we can do to revive the project. > > > Looking at the Jira tracker[1] I think we can start by fixing the bugs > and > > > work towards a new release. Would love to see Stanbol active again, > and see > > > the senior developers back on the list :) > > > > > > I will start to engage again as much as possible. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Dileepa > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/STANBOL/summary > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:15 PM Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Roman, > > > > > > > > I'm Rafa Haro, current PMC member of Apache Stanbol. I think we have > > > > discussed this situation a couple of times in the past few months. > There > > > > were a similar inquiry recently and back then, at least 3 "active" > > > > (including me) PMC members responded with similar answers: we would > be > > > > somehow available for bug fixing, attend the mailing lists and so on > but, > > > > because of lack of time, further contributions like working on the > backlog, > > > > community development....had to be eventually abandoned. I think this > > > > situation is extensible to most of current committers. Within the > same > > > > threads, there were Stanbol's users that were interesting in taking > the > > > > project out of this "blockage" but the reality is that this > situation has > > > > remained the same for months and the activity at the mailing lists is > > > > minimum. So maybe yeah, probably it is a shame and maybe it is time > to > > > > archive the project. > > > > > > > > I'm not sure which are the implications of putting the project into > the > > > > Attic from the organisation point of view, but in my honest opinion > it is > > > > that or, somehow, I don't know exactly how, try to find or extend the > > > > community with new members interested in further improvements and > uses > > > > cases around Stanbol that could lead to resurrect the project. > > > > > > > > Warm regards from Seville > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 3:15 AM Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 9:47 AM Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > > > > > a few months ago Shane Curcuru started this discussion > > > > > > around the level of PMC activity in the project: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7f85aecc5180b85d888cf63a8136521739e5e1ee74ae167abd3ab9ff@%3Cdev.stanbol.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > > > > at the time it seemed like the consensus was: there's > > > > > > enough folks interested in at least overseeing mechanics > > > > > > of the PMC. However if a few months since it would seem > > > > > > that we're back to where Shane's discussion started. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, this is, of course, based on my cursory review of mailing > > > > > > list and JIRA activity, but it seems that out of the current 22 > PMC > > > > > > members only one or two are active (and I don't mean writing > > > > > > code active, but at least supporting "mechanics" of the PMC): > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?pmc=stanbol > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm wondering, perhaps, if it would benefit the project to > consider > > > > > > expanding the PMC to include the other 4 committers and/or > > > > > > some of the project's active users. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > Hi Again! > > > > > > > > > > it seems that there hasn't been much of a feedback on this thread > so > > > > > I'm expanding it to users@ as well. > > > > > > > > > > The concern here is that unless the community comes up with at > least 3 > > > > > reasonably active PMC > > > > > members to make sure that the project can continue it may be end up > > > > > "archived" into Apache Attic. > > > > > > > > > > Now, these PMC members do NOT have to be existing PMC members, if > > > > > there's enough enthusiastic > > > > > folks in the user community we can definitely look into "rebooting" > > > > > the PMC that way. > > > > > > > > > > If anybody is interested in making sure that Stanbol continues as > an > > > > > active Apache project -- please > > > > > reply to this thread. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Roman. > > > > > > > > > > > >
