I'm open to change, but yes, I started with core storm since it offers the most flexibility wrt how Beam constructs are translated.
-Taylor > On Sep 15, 2016, at 5:51 PM, Roshan Naik <[email protected]> wrote: > > Good idea. Will the Beam API be implemented to run on top Storm Core > primitives ? > -roshan > > >> On 9/15/16, 2:00 PM, "P. Taylor Goetz" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I¹ve been tinkering with implementing an Apache Beam runner on top of >> Storm and would like to open it up so others in the community can >> contribute. To that end I¹d like to propose creating a feature branch for >> that work if there are others who are interested in getting involved. We >> did that a while back when storm-sql was originally developed. >> >> Basically, review requirements for that branch would be relaxed during >> development, with a final, strict review before merging back to one of >> our main branches. >> >> I¹d like to document what I have and future improvements in a proposal >> document, and follow that with pushing the code to the feature branch for >> group collaboration. >> >> Any thoughts? Anyone interested in contributing to such an effort? >> >> -Taylor >
