If there are no objections, I’d like to create the feature branch and push what I have so far. I’ve not had too much time lately to work on it, but other’s have expressed interest in contributing so I’d like to make it available.
-Taylor > On Sep 19, 2016, at 11:15 AM, Bobby Evans <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 on the idea. I would love to contribute, but I doubt I will find time to > do it any time soon. - Bobby > > On Friday, September 16, 2016 12:05 AM, Satish Duggana > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Taylor, > I am interested in contributing to this effort. Gone through Beam APIs > earlier and had some initial thoughts on Storm runner. We can start with > existing core storm constructs but it is better to design in such a way > that these can be replaced with new APIs. > > Thanks, > Satish. > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 3:35 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm open to change, but yes, I started with core storm since it offers the >> most flexibility wrt how Beam constructs are translated. >> >> -Taylor >> >>> On Sep 15, 2016, at 5:51 PM, Roshan Naik <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Good idea. Will the Beam API be implemented to run on top Storm Core >>> primitives ? >>> -roshan >>> >>> >>>> On 9/15/16, 2:00 PM, "P. Taylor Goetz" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> I¹ve been tinkering with implementing an Apache Beam runner on top of >>>> Storm and would like to open it up so others in the community can >>>> contribute. To that end I¹d like to propose creating a feature branch >> for >>>> that work if there are others who are interested in getting involved. We >>>> did that a while back when storm-sql was originally developed. >>>> >>>> Basically, review requirements for that branch would be relaxed during >>>> development, with a final, strict review before merging back to one of >>>> our main branches. >>>> >>>> I¹d like to document what I have and future improvements in a proposal >>>> document, and follow that with pushing the code to the feature branch >> for >>>> group collaboration. >>>> >>>> Any thoughts? Anyone interested in contributing to such an effort? >>>> >>>> -Taylor >>> >> >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
