Hugo, This appears to be the branch:
- https://github.com/apache/storm/tree/beam-runner - Erik On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Hugo Da Cruz Louro <[email protected]> wrote: > I somehow missed this email … I would like to contribute to this effort as > well. Please keep me posted. > Thanks. > > > On Oct 19, 2016, at 8:51 AM, Satish Duggana <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > +1, waiting for that. :) > > Currently,there are API changes going on in Beam. It seem they plan to > get > > that done by the end of 2016. > > > > ~Satish. > > > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Bobby Evans <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > >> +1 - Bobby > >> > >> On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 10:30 AM, Arun Mahadevan < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> On 10/19/16, 8:58 PM, "P. Taylor Goetz" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> If there are no objections, I’d like to create the feature branch and > >> push what I have so far. I’ve not had too much time lately to work on > it, > >> but other’s have expressed interest in contributing so I’d like to make > it > >> available. > >>> > >>> -Taylor > >>> > >>> > >>>> On Sep 19, 2016, at 11:15 AM, Bobby Evans <[email protected] > > > >> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> +1 on the idea. I would love to contribute, but I doubt I will find > >> time to do it any time soon. - Bobby > >>>> > >>>> On Friday, September 16, 2016 12:05 AM, Satish Duggana < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Taylor, > >>>> I am interested in contributing to this effort. Gone through Beam APIs > >>>> earlier and had some initial thoughts on Storm runner. We can start > with > >>>> existing core storm constructs but it is better to design in such a > way > >>>> that these can be replaced with new APIs. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Satish. > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 3:35 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I'm open to change, but yes, I started with core storm since it > offers > >> the > >>>>> most flexibility wrt how Beam constructs are translated. > >>>>> > >>>>> -Taylor > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Sep 15, 2016, at 5:51 PM, Roshan Naik <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Good idea. Will the Beam API be implemented to run on top Storm Core > >>>>>> primitives ? > >>>>>> -roshan > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 9/15/16, 2:00 PM, "P. Taylor Goetz" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I¹ve been tinkering with implementing an Apache Beam runner on top > of > >>>>>>> Storm and would like to open it up so others in the community can > >>>>>>> contribute. To that end I¹d like to propose creating a feature > branch > >>>>> for > >>>>>>> that work if there are others who are interested in getting > >> involved. We > >>>>>>> did that a while back when storm-sql was originally developed. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Basically, review requirements for that branch would be relaxed > >> during > >>>>>>> development, with a final, strict review before merging back to one > >> of > >>>>>>> our main branches. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I¹d like to document what I have and future improvements in a > >> proposal > >>>>>>> document, and follow that with pushing the code to the feature > branch > >>>>> for > >>>>>>> group collaboration. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Any thoughts? Anyone interested in contributing to such an effort? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -Taylor > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >
