I somehow missed this email … I would like to contribute to this effort as well. Please keep me posted. Thanks.
> On Oct 19, 2016, at 8:51 AM, Satish Duggana <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1, waiting for that. :) > Currently,there are API changes going on in Beam. It seem they plan to get > that done by the end of 2016. > > ~Satish. > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Bobby Evans <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 - Bobby >> >> On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 10:30 AM, Arun Mahadevan < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> +1 >> >> On 10/19/16, 8:58 PM, "P. Taylor Goetz" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> If there are no objections, I’d like to create the feature branch and >> push what I have so far. I’ve not had too much time lately to work on it, >> but other’s have expressed interest in contributing so I’d like to make it >> available. >>> >>> -Taylor >>> >>> >>>> On Sep 19, 2016, at 11:15 AM, Bobby Evans <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 on the idea. I would love to contribute, but I doubt I will find >> time to do it any time soon. - Bobby >>>> >>>> On Friday, September 16, 2016 12:05 AM, Satish Duggana < >> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Taylor, >>>> I am interested in contributing to this effort. Gone through Beam APIs >>>> earlier and had some initial thoughts on Storm runner. We can start with >>>> existing core storm constructs but it is better to design in such a way >>>> that these can be replaced with new APIs. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Satish. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 3:35 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm open to change, but yes, I started with core storm since it offers >> the >>>>> most flexibility wrt how Beam constructs are translated. >>>>> >>>>> -Taylor >>>>> >>>>>> On Sep 15, 2016, at 5:51 PM, Roshan Naik <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Good idea. Will the Beam API be implemented to run on top Storm Core >>>>>> primitives ? >>>>>> -roshan >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 9/15/16, 2:00 PM, "P. Taylor Goetz" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I¹ve been tinkering with implementing an Apache Beam runner on top of >>>>>>> Storm and would like to open it up so others in the community can >>>>>>> contribute. To that end I¹d like to propose creating a feature branch >>>>> for >>>>>>> that work if there are others who are interested in getting >> involved. We >>>>>>> did that a while back when storm-sql was originally developed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Basically, review requirements for that branch would be relaxed >> during >>>>>>> development, with a final, strict review before merging back to one >> of >>>>>>> our main branches. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I¹d like to document what I have and future improvements in a >> proposal >>>>>>> document, and follow that with pushing the code to the feature branch >>>>> for >>>>>>> group collaboration. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any thoughts? Anyone interested in contributing to such an effort? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Taylor >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
