Hugo, now that you are a PMC member your vote is binding.

While releases can’t be vetoed (a release vote needs at least three +1s and 
more +1s than -1s), it’s typical to take negative votes under serious 
consideration.

So considering Hugo’s -1 vote, do we want cancel in order to include the 
proposed fix? It would also give us a chance to update the connector 
documentation regarding location of binary artifacts.

-Taylor


> On Mar 23, 2017, at 11:58 AM, Hugo Da Cruz Louro <hlo...@hortonworks.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> -1 (non binding)
> 
> This blocker bug was just reported - 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2432
> Here is the fix: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2027
> 
> I consider that this is a blocker bug because if the user choses 
> UNCOMITTED_LATEST first poll strategy, no data gets polled at all.
> 
> Thanks,
> Hugo
> 
> On Mar 23, 2017, at 8:48 AM, Harsha Chintalapani 
> <st...@harsha.io<mailto:st...@harsha.io>> wrote:
> 
> +1 for documenting and releasing.
> -Harsha
> 
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 7:04 AM Jungtaek Lim 
> <kabh...@gmail.com<mailto:kabh...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> +1 to the latter.
> 
> I'm in favor of documenting the change to release note, and also docs so
> that website can be reflected. The users who are affected to the change
> wouldn't be much, since using dependency management tool (Maven, Gradle,
> and so on) has been recommended for creating topology jar.
> 
> For me it's not a blocker for release.
> 
> Arun, I initiated another thread to discuss moving non-connectors to the
> top directory.
> Could you cast your vote? If you are still not satisfied with excluding
> jars you can cast -0 or even -1.
> 
> - Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
> 
> 2017년 3월 23일 (목) 오후 10:43, P. Taylor Goetz 
> <ptgo...@gmail.com<mailto:ptgo...@gmail.com>>님이 작성:
> 
> Do we want to cancel this RC in order to better document the changes, or
> will documenting it in the release announcement suffice for now (provided
> documentation is added for subsequent releases)?
> 
> I’m partial to the latter, but am open to others’ opinions.
> 
> -Taylor
> 
> 
> On Mar 22, 2017, at 9:49 AM, Bobby Evans 
> <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID<mailto:ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID>>
> wrote:
> 
> +1 I built form the tag and ran using a single node cluster.
> The examples and external components are excluded because they are
> huge.  Because of shading they we distribute the same copy of them
> multiple
> times.
> I agree with Alexandre.  We should document this change better, because
> it is confusing for people to get a release that used to have these in
> it,
> but does not any more.
> 
> 
> - Bobby
> 
> On Tuesday, March 21, 2017, 10:46:38 PM CDT, Arun Mahadevan <
> ar...@apache.org<mailto:ar...@apache.org>> wrote:Verified the artifacts. 
> Compiled examples and
> ran
> some sample topologies. Looks good.
> 
> BTW, why are the external modules excluded from the binaries (the .zip
> and .tar.gz). Isn’t it better if the binary distribution includes them?
> Maybe it was already discussed but I am missing it. The sql directory
> however seems to include the jars so it looks inconsistent.
> 
> - Arun
> 
> 
> On 3/22/17, 12:56 AM, "P. Taylor Goetz" 
> <ptgo...@apache.org<mailto:ptgo...@apache.org>> wrote:
> 
> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 1.1.0 (rc3)
> 
> Full list of changes in this release:
> 
> 
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;h=68fbab3c4f91359bd397d93a157830542839b002;hb=e40d213de7067f7d3aa4d4992b81890d8ed6ff31
> 
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v1.1.0:
> 
> 
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=7fa62404feb6b86b3143c851b46237580720eb6b;hb=e40d213de7067f7d3aa4d4992b81890d8ed6ff31
> 
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> 
> 
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1.1.0-rc3/apache-storm-1.1.0-src.tar.gz
> 
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1.1.0-rc3/
> 
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> 
> 
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> 
> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> 
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1047
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 1.1.0.
> 
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 1.1.0
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> 
> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
> 
> -Taylor
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to