Craig McClanahan wrote: <snip> focused on the "revolution" approach rather than "evolution".
That's not to say that we (as a project) can't do both in parallel.
Ted wrote: " Hopefully, initiatives like Struts Chain and Portlet support will help us make the HTTP layer an "integration" layer, rather than a "system" layer, as it is today. "
</snip>
Just to state the obvious, in CoR Context (a map really) the signature does not change based on request/response or anything realy.
The Struts chain code based on Commons CoR code in CVS can support 2.3 and 2.4, Portlet, Faces, sitemesh, Soa, whatever.
Even the signature is defined.
So 2.3 vs 2.4 vs parallel is minor point, if you just leverage the Craig code in there already. I assume both evolution and revolution would leverage CoR (and not fork the limited resources).
If somone smart can tune the "base" classes, then a 2.3 and 2.4 can just be packages under, just like portlet and faces.
.V
-- Please post on Rich Internet Applications User Interface (RiA/SoA) <http://www.portalvu.com>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
