Thanks, Ted. Nice to hear someone say "Let's talk" rather than "Shaddup". ///;-)
On Apr 7, 2005 10:28 AM, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 7, 2005 1:12 PM, Fogleson, Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jack, > > > > Actually my comments were in no way an answer to his proposal. I believe > > that under the rules of Apache we have already gotten our answer to > > whether it will be included as a subproject of struts. To be included > > there must be no vetoing vote by a member of the PMC. (pardon me Martin > > if I misquote you or I misinterpreted your intent) Martin Cooper is a > > member of the PMC and basically gave a -1 vote on including it as a > > subproject. > > Just as point of order, vetos only apply to product changes. Adopting > a subproject is a 3/4 majority vote. > > http://struts.apache.org/bylaws.html > > And, there is not enough here to even think about voting on subproject > status. We don't vote on good intentions. A product would have to be > very nearly complete, and have already attracted a following, before > we'd want to consider a subproject vote. > > This is an informal discussion. Frank just wanted to run it up the flag pole. > > -Ted. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
