DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34849>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34849 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-26 20:09 ------- I think Lukas' suggestion is a decent one, with the caveat that we would check the thread for a context class loader rather than directly using Class.forName("")... On the other hand, I wouldn't feel too bad about adding a commons-lang dependency just because it might be useful in many places. I think maybe for the IterationEnumerator, the private class approach is better, as Lukas suggested. Opinions on a compile time dependency on commons-lang? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]