On 3/20/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Wendy, that's what I needed to hear. So far, I haven't heard any -1 > type objections, so I'll take your advice > and try the reorg on that other svn site. > > When I have it working correctly, I suppose I'll call for the vote. This > would be a significant change, and honestly, I > thought there'd be a lot more resistance :) Not that I'm complaining....
>From me? As long as I get my fancy Maven build, I'm happy. ;) I'm in favor of grouping the Action-related modules in the repository. From a release manager perspective, (now that I have one,) I'm less thrilled about the consolidated release, but that only means I'm less likely to volunteer to do it. Struts Action 1.3.1 was simple to put together, while Shale 1.0.1 was _not_. Being able to concentrate on a single jar, a single set of docs, etc., better fits into the blocks of time that I can devote to this. I don't think the separate releases ever got a chance to prove themselves, but if more people (who are going to do the work) want the consolidated release, it's fine with me. Looking at the list again, struts-tiles is missing. And I'm not sure how Faces is going to fit in there, it has a different set of dependencies than the others. That will all sort itself out when you start moving things around, though. :) -- Wendy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
