Wendy posted a snapshot to get some preliminary feedback.
* http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40struts.apache.org/msg22386.html If Joe's issue is resolved, then the next step would be to tag the repository, roll the build, and post a release vote. If the vote gets at least three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s, then we can post a link on the downloads page. We can publish any release, Alpha, Beta, or GA, and later change the grade based on feed back form the rest of the users, but we do need for there to be a release vote first. We haven't published the other 1.3.x builds since there were technical problems with the distributions. -Ted. On 5/28/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To get developer traction, can we begin posting beta builds onto the website? It would be nice to see a "1.3.5 (Beta)" link listed there to view the snapshot website. And why not? As long as we listd it as not a production build, we can give it publicility. We have done that with "Struts 1.2.x", so if not "1.3.5 (Beta), at least "1.3.x" Paul __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- HTH, Ted. * http://www.husted.com/struts/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
