I propose code names Velvet and Rubert. Any objections?

Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mua-ha-ha :-))

+1 on renaming back.

Also, hoping not to hijaack this thread I would suggest coming up with
codenames for 1.x and 2.x codebases. This had been suggested and
discussed long ago but was rejected.

Why codenames make sense:
* Job search. SAF1 and SAF2... oh... I mean, Struts 1.x and Struts 2.x
are different, required skills are different. Having codenames will
seriously help to narrow the search to desired framework.
* Perception. While SAF2 might be a leap forward indeed, it is a leap
sideways as well. Maybe a little. It is different enough. Codenames
will level the perception. Like Chicago and Cairo, for example.
* It is just fun. See Ubuntu distros for example.

Anyway, I liked Classic for 1.x, still like it :-)

Or instead of typing 1.x and 2.x let's say Struts 1 and Struts 2,
where Struts 2 can easily have 3.x or 4.x version numbers.

Or just Struts Sucky and Struts Non-sucky.

Or Struts and StrutsWork.

On 6/28/06, Don Brown  wrote:
> With the departure of Struts Shale, I think it is time we return to the idea 
> of
> Struts as a single, unified framework.  While I had hoped we could do this by
> including Shale, everyone involved felt Shale deserved its own project and so
> I'm adjusting my original Struts 2.0 proposal to simply rename Struts Action 
> as
> Struts.
>
> The ramifications of such a renaming up for discussion:
>   1. Struts Action 1.3 becomes Struts 1.3 and Struts Action 2.0 becomes 
> Struts 2.0
>   2. We rename the https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/action subversion
> directory as https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/framework, keep the other
> top level directories the same
>   3. The org.apache.struts.action2 package becomes org.apache.struts2
>   4. action.* and struts-action.* configuration files become struts.*
>   5. The SAF acronym in the documentation would return to Struts
>
> Given all the product naming changes in the last few years (much of which was 
> my
> fault, I admit), I'd like to have these changes decided on soon, so we can 
> move
> on to getting Struts 2.0 out the door.
>
> Don

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



                
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Everyone is raving about the  all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.

Reply via email to