I think it is as simple as Struts 1.3, Struts 1.4, Struts 2.0, Struts
2.1,
etc... The whole point of this proposal is to unify Struts as a
single project,
getting away from this concept of separately versioned
"subprojects". There
will be Struts 1.x releases, and there will be Struts 2.x releases,
and perhaps
some day, Struts 3.x releases.
Don
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
> You mean, Struts 2.0 version 2.0, then Struts 2.0 version 2.1, Struts
> 2.0 version 2.2, ..., Struts 2.0 version 3.0, ..., Struts 2.0 version
> 4.0
>
> :-)
>
> 2.0 is a version number, while we are choosing project names (Are we?)
> Do we treat Struts2 as the next version, or do we treat Struts and
> Struts2 as separate subprojects like Win9x/Me vs. WinNT/2K/XP ?
> (Obviously I prefer the latter)
> How version numbers correspond to project names?
> Can Struts 2 subproject have version number higher than 2.x? (I
think yes)
> Can Struts [implied: 1] have version numbers higher than 1.x?
> (theoretically yes, but that would be bizzare)
>
> On 6/28/06, Bob Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> +1 for Struts 2.0
>>
>> Bob
>>
>> On 6/28/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > With the departure of Struts Shale, I think it is time we return
to the
>> > idea of
>> > Struts as a single, unified framework. While I had hoped we could
>> do this
>> > by
>> > including Shale, everyone involved felt Shale deserved its own
>> project and
>> > so
>> > I'm adjusting my original Struts 2.0 proposal to simply rename
Struts
>> > Action as
>> > Struts.
>> >
>> > The ramifications of such a renaming up for discussion:
>> > 1. Struts Action 1.3 becomes Struts 1.3 and Struts Action 2.0
becomes
>> > Struts 2.0
>> > 2. We rename the
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/actionsubversion
>> > directory as https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/framework, keep
>> the
>> > other
>> > top level directories the same
>> > 3. The org.apache.struts.action2 package becomes
org.apache.struts2
>> > 4. action.* and struts-action.* configuration files become
struts.*
>> > 5. The SAF acronym in the documentation would return to Struts
>> >
>> > Given all the product naming changes in the last few years (much of
>> which
>> > was my
>> > fault, I admit), I'd like to have these changes decided on soon, so
>> we can
>> > move
>> > on to getting Struts 2.0 out the door.
>> >
>> > Don
>> >
>> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]