On 6/28/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/28/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ted Husted wrote: > > Though, there's no reason why we couldn't use > > > >> repos/asf/struts/struts1 > >> repos/asf/struts/struts2 > > > > Or > > > >> repos/asf/struts/framework > >> repos/asf/struts/framework2 > > I like struts1/struts2. Yep, I do too. It's simple and straighforward - the best way to minimise confusion and make it obvious what goes where.
+1. If we're not going to go with "codename" identifiers (although I'm personally partial to that ... all the Creator releases have had shark-themed names :-), then struts1/struts2 makes a lot of sense. The "generational" theme resonates, and encourages the correct amount of forethought before making substantively backwards incompatible changes. --
Martin Cooper
Craig
