I respectfully disagree. I think having to clarify "Struts" as "1"
or "2" is just as bad as having to say "Struts Action 1" vs. "Struts
Action 2" vs. "Shale".
Believe me, I'm not trying to discount the 1.x development. I have
stated as much on several threads. Also, I have many 1.x apps to
support, and I think my recent work on getting the 1.2.x and 1.3.x
nightlies back online proves my commitment to both of those lines. I
will be doing more as time allows.
I just think we should all just get used to a default when we say
"Struts". And if we mean an different/older version, then can say so.
Your thoughts?
--
James Mitchell
On Jul 5, 2006, at 3:33 PM, Hubert Rabago wrote:
That assumes all the development and support effort go towards one
framework, Struts 2. If we're still actively supporting and
developing the Struts 1.x line, then references to "Struts" should
include a qualification of which Struts framework is meant.
Hubert
On 7/5/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IMHO "Struts" means the latest/current development....in other
words...SAF2, struts2, 2.x,
I think we should just say "Struts", but clarify only if we mean an
older version. I mean, we do that now with everything else. If
someone has a question about Struts, and it happens to pertain to 1.0
or 1.1, they usually say so. Same goes for other libraries/
frameworks.
Just my $0.02
--
James Mitchell
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
