Ted Husted wrote:
Both the datetimepicker and the action-redirect prefix worked in the
2.0.1 beta but don't work now. Both are outright bugs, and it's
unlikely we would get positive votes for a build with know defects.
AFAIK, the JavaScript error (WW-1559) doesn't impede functionality. It
might keep people from voting GA, but with the XWork RC dependency,
that's not going to happen anyway.
Ahh, ok, you misunderstood me. What I'm saying is that I think it DOES
impede functionality. It's a bug that was not present in 2.0.1 (AFAIK)
but is now. The js error prevents the submission of values from occuring.
-Ted.
On 12/27/06, David H. DeWolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's fine with me, just help me understand the difference between this
and the datetimepicker and action-redirect issues. . .what makes them
showstoppers?
not trying to be a pain, just trying to understand :)
David
Ted Husted wrote:
> The problem is that we have a an issue report, but no suggestions as
> to a resolution. If we have a patch to apply for 2.0.2, that would be
> great. But, otherwise, we might want to keep it as a known issue to
> fix as soon as we figure out how. A 2.0.2 release is not going to a a
> GA candidate anyway since XWork 2 is only at RC1.
>
> -Ted.
>
> On 12/27/06, David H. DeWolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> After some more testing, it appears as though the javascript issues
>> associated with the optiontransferselect (WW-1559) are actually
>> effecting it's behavior. I think we should add this back to the 2.0.2
>> list.
>>
>> I'm not all that familiar with dojo, but I'll start to look into it
>> today.
>>
>> David
>>
>> Ted Husted wrote:
>> > We're down to a handful of problems, which are all reflected in the
>> > Showcase examples, one way or the other. Some of these were also
>> > present in Struts 2.0.1, and so may be a problem with the example
>> > itself.
>> >
>> > * https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1538
>> >
>> > The showstoppers are the action-redirect prefix and the datetime
>> picker.
>> >
>> > If we were down to one or the other, I'd be tempted to roll 2.0.2,
>> > just for fun, but two non-functioning features seems a bit much --
>> > when we usually shoot for zero. :)
>> >
>> > -Ted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
