do you mean to move the plugin out of Struts? Because Dojo is already on its own plugin in trunk.
musachy On 8/18/07, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 on moving Dojo out of the core to a plugin. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ian Roughley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 1:34 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: Ajax Theme > > So let me ask this - what is the percentage of code that has changed > between 2.0.x and 2.1.x as far as the Ajax tags go? > > To answer Ted's questions, my feeling to is move them out the core and > into a plugin. There have been quiet a few headaches with dojo upgrades > during the initial ww2 implementation. If nothing else, it would allow > the dojo and s2 release schedules to proceed independently (i.e. s2 > users would not be forced to use an old version of dojo until the new s2 > release, because of a dojo API change). > > /Ian > > Musachy Barroso wrote: > > On 2.1 ajax validation will be provided by Dojo by default, but other > > libraries can be used easily, (with prototype example): > > > > http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/ajax-validation.html > > > > musachy > > > > On 8/17/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I haven't dived into this part of the source code, but I've beent > >> taking "The ajax validation depends on DWR" to mean that we use DWR to > >> call the usual server-side validators from client-side ajax code. Is > >> that correct? > >> > >> Is the use of DWR changing from 2.0.x to 2.1.x? > >> > >> Does the YUI Ajax plugin support validation? > >> > >> Has anyone tried the YUI plugin against the head? > >> > >> (And just to make our question day complete:) > >> > >> Do we want to bundle the Dojo plugin with Struts 2.1.x, or do we want > >> to consider moving it to a Google Code site (perhpas with YUI), while > >> it is still "experimental": > >> > >> -Ted. > >> > >> On 8/15/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> The ajax validation depends on DWR > >>> > >>> musachy > >>> > >>> On 8/15/07, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Is the ajax theme in the 2.0.x branch completely Dojo driven now? If > >>>> so, there seems to be a lot of DWR code that could be removed (i.e. > from > >>>> the web.xml and form.ftl). I can open a ticket if this is the case. > >>>> > >>>> /Ian > >>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> -- > >>> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> -- > >> HTH, Ted <http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
