There aren't many differences, lots of bug fixes and some new features based on user request from the user list, I would say 10%-15%.
musachy On 8/19/07, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My personal preference would be out of Struts - unless, the plugins > within Struts2 can have independent life cycles (which at the moment > doesn't seem to be the case). And, once again, this is biased on the > implementation of the ww2 tags where the dojo API was rapidly changing > :) If the dojo API has settled to a point where s2 can be one or two > point release behind the most recent, or user can easily swap out the s2 > dojo scripts for the most recent dojo scripts and have the plugin > functionality work, I would be okay with the dojo plugin staying in the > struts2 core as a plugin. > > Musachy, - what is the percentage of code that has changed between 2.0.x > and 2.1.x as far as the Ajax tags implementation goes? > > /Ian > > Musachy Barroso wrote: > > do you mean to move the plugin out of Struts? Because Dojo is already > > on its own plugin in trunk. > > > > musachy > > > > On 8/18/07, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> +1 on moving Dojo out of the core to a plugin. > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Ian Roughley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 1:34 PM > >> To: Struts Developers List > >> Subject: Re: Ajax Theme > >> > >> So let me ask this - what is the percentage of code that has changed > >> between 2.0.x and 2.1.x as far as the Ajax tags go? > >> > >> To answer Ted's questions, my feeling to is move them out the core and > >> into a plugin. There have been quiet a few headaches with dojo upgrades > >> during the initial ww2 implementation. If nothing else, it would allow > >> the dojo and s2 release schedules to proceed independently (i.e. s2 > >> users would not be forced to use an old version of dojo until the new s2 > >> release, because of a dojo API change). > >> > >> /Ian > >> > >> Musachy Barroso wrote: > >> > >>> On 2.1 ajax validation will be provided by Dojo by default, but other > >>> libraries can be used easily, (with prototype example): > >>> > >>> http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/ajax-validation.html > >>> > >>> musachy > >>> > >>> On 8/17/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> I haven't dived into this part of the source code, but I've beent > >>>> taking "The ajax validation depends on DWR" to mean that we use DWR to > >>>> call the usual server-side validators from client-side ajax code. Is > >>>> that correct? > >>>> > >>>> Is the use of DWR changing from 2.0.x to 2.1.x? > >>>> > >>>> Does the YUI Ajax plugin support validation? > >>>> > >>>> Has anyone tried the YUI plugin against the head? > >>>> > >>>> (And just to make our question day complete:) > >>>> > >>>> Do we want to bundle the Dojo plugin with Struts 2.1.x, or do we want > >>>> to consider moving it to a Google Code site (perhpas with YUI), while > >>>> it is still "experimental": > >>>> > >>>> -Ted. > >>>> > >>>> On 8/15/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> The ajax validation depends on DWR > >>>>> > >>>>> musachy > >>>>> > >>>>> On 8/15/07, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Is the ajax theme in the 2.0.x branch completely Dojo driven now? If > >>>>>> so, there seems to be a lot of DWR code that could be removed (i.e. > >>>>>> > >> from > >> > >>>>>> the web.xml and form.ftl). I can open a ticket if this is the case. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> /Ian > >>>>>> > >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > >>>>> > >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> HTH, Ted <http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/> > >>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
