The ajax tags musachy
On 8/19/07, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Musachy, are you talking 10%-15% difference between the Ajax tags in > 2.0.x and 2.1.x, or in versions of Dojo? > > Frank > > Musachy Barroso wrote: > > There aren't many differences, lots of bug fixes and some new features > > based on user request from the user list, I would say 10%-15%. > > > > musachy > > > > On 8/19/07, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> My personal preference would be out of Struts - unless, the plugins > >> within Struts2 can have independent life cycles (which at the moment > >> doesn't seem to be the case). And, once again, this is biased on the > >> implementation of the ww2 tags where the dojo API was rapidly changing > >> :) If the dojo API has settled to a point where s2 can be one or two > >> point release behind the most recent, or user can easily swap out the s2 > >> dojo scripts for the most recent dojo scripts and have the plugin > >> functionality work, I would be okay with the dojo plugin staying in the > >> struts2 core as a plugin. > >> > >> Musachy, - what is the percentage of code that has changed between 2.0.x > >> and 2.1.x as far as the Ajax tags implementation goes? > >> > >> /Ian > >> > >> Musachy Barroso wrote: > >>> do you mean to move the plugin out of Struts? Because Dojo is already > >>> on its own plugin in trunk. > >>> > >>> musachy > >>> > >>> On 8/18/07, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> +1 on moving Dojo out of the core to a plugin. > >>>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Ian Roughley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 1:34 PM > >>>> To: Struts Developers List > >>>> Subject: Re: Ajax Theme > >>>> > >>>> So let me ask this - what is the percentage of code that has changed > >>>> between 2.0.x and 2.1.x as far as the Ajax tags go? > >>>> > >>>> To answer Ted's questions, my feeling to is move them out the core and > >>>> into a plugin. There have been quiet a few headaches with dojo upgrades > >>>> during the initial ww2 implementation. If nothing else, it would allow > >>>> the dojo and s2 release schedules to proceed independently (i.e. s2 > >>>> users would not be forced to use an old version of dojo until the new s2 > >>>> release, because of a dojo API change). > >>>> > >>>> /Ian > >>>> > >>>> Musachy Barroso wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On 2.1 ajax validation will be provided by Dojo by default, but other > >>>>> libraries can be used easily, (with prototype example): > >>>>> > >>>>> http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/ajax-validation.html > >>>>> > >>>>> musachy > >>>>> > >>>>> On 8/17/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> I haven't dived into this part of the source code, but I've beent > >>>>>> taking "The ajax validation depends on DWR" to mean that we use DWR to > >>>>>> call the usual server-side validators from client-side ajax code. Is > >>>>>> that correct? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Is the use of DWR changing from 2.0.x to 2.1.x? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Does the YUI Ajax plugin support validation? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Has anyone tried the YUI plugin against the head? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> (And just to make our question day complete:) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Do we want to bundle the Dojo plugin with Struts 2.1.x, or do we want > >>>>>> to consider moving it to a Google Code site (perhpas with YUI), while > >>>>>> it is still "experimental": > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -Ted. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 8/15/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> The ajax validation depends on DWR > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> musachy > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 8/15/07, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Is the ajax theme in the 2.0.x branch completely Dojo driven now? If > >>>>>>>> so, there seems to be a lot of DWR code that could be removed (i.e. > >>>>>>>> > >>>> from > >>>> > >>>>>>>> the web.xml and form.ftl). I can open a ticket if this is the case. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> /Ian > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> HTH, Ted <http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > > > > > > -- > -- > Frank W. Zammetti > Founder and Chief Software Architect > Omnytex Technologies > http://www.omnytex.com > AIM/Yahoo: fzammetti > MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Author of "Practical Ajax Projects With Java Technology" > (2006, Apress, ISBN 1-59059-695-1) > and "JavaScript, DOM Scripting and Ajax Projects" > (2007, Apress, ISBN 1-59059-816-4) > Java Web Parts - http://javawebparts.sourceforge.net > Supplying the wheel, so you don't have to reinvent it! > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
