I concur that it should be a module within Struts and thus carry the version number of the Struts release.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Rene Gielen <gie...@it-neering.net> wrote: > Besides the wrong versioning (XW 2.1.5 vs. 2.1.8), that's a reasonable > plan. To clarify the possible S2.2 plan as I understand (and prefer) it, > it would be a struts2-xwork module within S2 build and release cycle, > providing an artifact on which struts2-core depends - could we get a > consensus on this? > > Dale Newfield schrieb: > > Is this an accurate summary? > > > > struts-2.1.8: still waiting on xwork-2.1.8 > > > > struts-2.2.x: assuming IP clearance process passes for xwork, fork it > > and have it still be a separate jar, but within the struts2 package. > > (Probably the only real change would be package names.) > > > > struts-3.x: merge struts2 and xwork. > > > > -Dale > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > > > -- > René Gielen > IT-Neering.net > Saarstrasse 100, 52062 Aachen, Germany > Tel: +49-(0)241-4010770 > Fax: +49-(0)241-4010771 > Cel: +49-(0)177-3194448 > http://twitter.com/rgielen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > >
