it looks better this time ;)
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Dale Newfield<d...@newfield.org> wrote:
> Clearly my attempt at clarification has failed (by 1 character!), as it's
> needed much restating to be precise (and accurate :-). Let me try this
> again:
>
> Struts 2.{0,1} branch depends upon external xwork with (mostly) non-matching
> version numbers
>
> Struts 2.1.8 (assuming GA) will depend upon external xwork 2.1.5
>
> Struts 2.2.x is proposed to depend upon a forked, internal jar named
> struts2-xwork that will get generated as another artifact within the struts2
> release, and thus will share version numbers with struts2.2 releases.
>
> Struts 3.x is proposed to not depend upon any xwork component, as the two
> codebases will be merged into one.
>
>
> Is there any dissent from this plan?
>
> -Dale
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
