2012/11/28 Dave Newton <davelnew...@gmail.com>: > We'll always rely on external libraries--and as has been mentioned, > our core competency isn't DI frameworks, nor should it be.
Always something new :-) > I'm not sure an XML config layer would be that difficult to build, but > even if it is, wouldn't it be preferable to use a substantially > more-mature DI implementation, which more support of more > functionality than the old, half-baked and hacked one we're using now? There is one already [1], but again it's another external dependency. The current internal DI is well mature, just one problem for several years is not so bad IMHO ;-) Anyway I'm a bit terrify if the new Guice allow us for all that magic we have right now - and at least keep the current configuration files to be in line with a new DI. [1] http://code.google.com/p/guice-xml-config/ Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
