+1

On 2020/12/13 06:31:39, Jesse Yang <[email protected]> wrote: 
> Dear Superset community,
> 
> During the last Superset meetup, we had a discussion on GitHub Discussions 
> <https://github.blog/2020-05-06-new-from-satellite-2020-github-codespaces-github-discussions-securing-code-in-private-repositories-and-more/>.
>  This is a feature GitHub announced in May which has been in open beta for 
> the last couple of months. Many open source projects have since adopted it 
> (including some apache projects, Airflow 
> <https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions>, Couchdb 
> <https://github.com/apache/couchdb/discussions>, MXNet 
> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/discussions>, and many others such 
> as Next.js <https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions>, Gatsby 
> <https://github.com/gatsbyjs/gatsby/discussions> and Strapi 
> <https://github.com/strapi/strapi/discussions>).
> 
> With Github Discussions, users can start casual conversations, ask questions 
> and get help from the community in a discussion board, similar to what they 
> are now able to do with Slack 
> <https://apache-superset.slack.com/join/shared_invite/zt-g8lpruog-HeqpgYrwdfrD5OYhlU7hPQ#/>,
>  StackOverflow 
> <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/superset+apache-superset>, or 
> this mailing list.
> 
> The main difference is that Discussions is more tightly integrated with the 
> GitHub repo and a developer's everyday workflow therefore more accessible and 
> discoverable. It has many useful features such as categories, upvotes and 
> indented thread view, which all makes organizing and discovering 
> conversations easier. By moving casual conversations to a new forum, it also 
> frees up GitHub Issues for actual TODOs and bug reports so that committers 
> can track work progress more efficiently.
> 
> This email is a call for discussion/vote on whether we should enable this 
> feature for Superset. Note that per Apache policy, such forum "can only be 
> used for user help issues, all code-related discussions and project 
> management activities (will still) be reflected to an ASF mailing list" [1]. 
> During the meetup, someone also raised the concern that this new venue of 
> conversations may split committer attention and lead to slower responses. But 
> one may argue since developers already use GitHub everyday, the attention may 
> not split that much anyway. Other than that, I personally don't see any major 
> downside.
> 
> Please feel free to voice your support or concerns one way or another.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Jesse
> 
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20772 
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20772> 

Reply via email to