INFRA ticket created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21195

> On Dec 15, 2020, at 5:35 PM, Tai Dupree <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> *+1 *from me. As an avid contributor to github issues and slack questions I
> often find myself answering the same questions multiple times (even on the
> same platform). I'm looking forward to the increased discoverability and
> persistence provided by github discussions.
> 
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 8:59 AM Srinivasa Kadamati <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> This would be great! The more things we can get out of Slack and into a
>> public place thats easier to keep track of (Slack swallows our history
>> frequently) the better!
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 11:36 AM Bence Orlai <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> it seems to me that GH Discussions nicely fills a place between Slack
>>> (realtime collaboration), emails (longer going threads) and GH issues
>>> (conversation around a specific, ... well... issue)
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 1:56 AM yongjie zhao <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> +1
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 5:22 PM Daniel Gaspar <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> +1
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 2020/12/13 06:31:39, Jesse Yang <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> Dear Superset community,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> During the last Superset meetup, we had a discussion on GitHub
>>>>> Discussions <
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://github.blog/2020-05-06-new-from-satellite-2020-github-codespaces-github-discussions-securing-code-in-private-repositories-and-more/
>>>>> .
>>>>> This is a feature GitHub announced in May which has been in open beta
>>> for
>>>>> the last couple of months. Many open source projects have since
>> adopted
>>>> it
>>>>> (including some apache projects, Airflow <
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions>, Couchdb <
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/couchdb/discussions>, MXNet <
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/discussions>, and many
>>> others
>>>>> such as Next.js <https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions>,
>>> Gatsby
>>>> <
>>>>> https://github.com/gatsbyjs/gatsby/discussions> and Strapi <
>>>>> https://github.com/strapi/strapi/discussions>).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> With Github Discussions, users can start casual conversations, ask
>>>>> questions and get help from the community in a discussion board,
>>> similar
>>>> to
>>>>> what they are now able to do with Slack <
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://apache-superset.slack.com/join/shared_invite/zt-g8lpruog-HeqpgYrwdfrD5OYhlU7hPQ#/
>>>>> ,
>>>>> StackOverflow <
>>>>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/superset+apache-superset
>>> ,
>>> or
>>>>> this mailing list.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The main difference is that Discussions is more tightly integrated
>>> with
>>>>> the GitHub repo and a developer's everyday workflow therefore more
>>>>> accessible and discoverable. It has many useful features such as
>>>>> categories, upvotes and indented thread view, which all makes
>>> organizing
>>>>> and discovering conversations easier. By moving casual conversations
>>> to a
>>>>> new forum, it also frees up GitHub Issues for actual TODOs and bug
>>>> reports
>>>>> so that committers can track work progress more efficiently.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This email is a call for discussion/vote on whether we should
>> enable
>>>>> this feature for Superset. Note that per Apache policy, such forum
>> "can
>>>>> only be used for user help issues, all code-related discussions and
>>>> project
>>>>> management activities (will still) be reflected to an ASF mailing
>> list"
>>>>> [1]. During the meetup, someone also raised the concern that this new
>>>> venue
>>>>> of conversations may split committer attention and lead to slower
>>>>> responses. But one may argue since developers already use GitHub
>>>> everyday,
>>>>> the attention may not split that much anyway. Other than that, I
>>>> personally
>>>>> don't see any major downside.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Please feel free to voice your support or concerns one way or
>>> another.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Jesse
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20772 <
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20772>
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to