*+1 *from me. As an avid contributor to github issues and slack questions I
often find myself answering the same questions multiple times (even on the
same platform). I'm looking forward to the increased discoverability and
persistence provided by github discussions.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 8:59 AM Srinivasa Kadamati <[email protected]> wrote:

> This would be great! The more things we can get out of Slack and into a
> public place thats easier to keep track of (Slack swallows our history
> frequently) the better!
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 11:36 AM Bence Orlai <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > it seems to me that GH Discussions nicely fills a place between Slack
> > (realtime collaboration), emails (longer going threads) and GH issues
> > (conversation around a specific, ... well... issue)
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 1:56 AM yongjie zhao <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 5:22 PM Daniel Gaspar <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On 2020/12/13 06:31:39, Jesse Yang <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > Dear Superset community,
> > > > >
> > > > > During the last Superset meetup, we had a discussion on GitHub
> > > > Discussions <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.blog/2020-05-06-new-from-satellite-2020-github-codespaces-github-discussions-securing-code-in-private-repositories-and-more/
> > > >.
> > > > This is a feature GitHub announced in May which has been in open beta
> > for
> > > > the last couple of months. Many open source projects have since
> adopted
> > > it
> > > > (including some apache projects, Airflow <
> > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions>, Couchdb <
> > > > https://github.com/apache/couchdb/discussions>, MXNet <
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/discussions>, and many
> > others
> > > > such as Next.js <https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions>,
> > Gatsby
> > > <
> > > > https://github.com/gatsbyjs/gatsby/discussions> and Strapi <
> > > > https://github.com/strapi/strapi/discussions>).
> > > > >
> > > > > With Github Discussions, users can start casual conversations, ask
> > > > questions and get help from the community in a discussion board,
> > similar
> > > to
> > > > what they are now able to do with Slack <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://apache-superset.slack.com/join/shared_invite/zt-g8lpruog-HeqpgYrwdfrD5OYhlU7hPQ#/
> > > >,
> > > > StackOverflow <
> > > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/superset+apache-superset
> >,
> > or
> > > > this mailing list.
> > > > >
> > > > > The main difference is that Discussions is more tightly integrated
> > with
> > > > the GitHub repo and a developer's everyday workflow therefore more
> > > > accessible and discoverable. It has many useful features such as
> > > > categories, upvotes and indented thread view, which all makes
> > organizing
> > > > and discovering conversations easier. By moving casual conversations
> > to a
> > > > new forum, it also frees up GitHub Issues for actual TODOs and bug
> > > reports
> > > > so that committers can track work progress more efficiently.
> > > > >
> > > > > This email is a call for discussion/vote on whether we should
> enable
> > > > this feature for Superset. Note that per Apache policy, such forum
> "can
> > > > only be used for user help issues, all code-related discussions and
> > > project
> > > > management activities (will still) be reflected to an ASF mailing
> list"
> > > > [1]. During the meetup, someone also raised the concern that this new
> > > venue
> > > > of conversations may split committer attention and lead to slower
> > > > responses. But one may argue since developers already use GitHub
> > > everyday,
> > > > the attention may not split that much anyway. Other than that, I
> > > personally
> > > > don't see any major downside.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please feel free to voice your support or concerns one way or
> > another.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Jesse
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20772 <
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20772>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to