This would be great! The more things we can get out of Slack and into a
public place thats easier to keep track of (Slack swallows our history
frequently) the better!

+1

On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 11:36 AM Bence Orlai <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1
>
> it seems to me that GH Discussions nicely fills a place between Slack
> (realtime collaboration), emails (longer going threads) and GH issues
> (conversation around a specific, ... well... issue)
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 1:56 AM yongjie zhao <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 5:22 PM Daniel Gaspar <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On 2020/12/13 06:31:39, Jesse Yang <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Dear Superset community,
> > > >
> > > > During the last Superset meetup, we had a discussion on GitHub
> > > Discussions <
> > >
> >
> https://github.blog/2020-05-06-new-from-satellite-2020-github-codespaces-github-discussions-securing-code-in-private-repositories-and-more/
> > >.
> > > This is a feature GitHub announced in May which has been in open beta
> for
> > > the last couple of months. Many open source projects have since adopted
> > it
> > > (including some apache projects, Airflow <
> > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions>, Couchdb <
> > > https://github.com/apache/couchdb/discussions>, MXNet <
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/discussions>, and many
> others
> > > such as Next.js <https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions>,
> Gatsby
> > <
> > > https://github.com/gatsbyjs/gatsby/discussions> and Strapi <
> > > https://github.com/strapi/strapi/discussions>).
> > > >
> > > > With Github Discussions, users can start casual conversations, ask
> > > questions and get help from the community in a discussion board,
> similar
> > to
> > > what they are now able to do with Slack <
> > >
> >
> https://apache-superset.slack.com/join/shared_invite/zt-g8lpruog-HeqpgYrwdfrD5OYhlU7hPQ#/
> > >,
> > > StackOverflow <
> > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/superset+apache-superset>,
> or
> > > this mailing list.
> > > >
> > > > The main difference is that Discussions is more tightly integrated
> with
> > > the GitHub repo and a developer's everyday workflow therefore more
> > > accessible and discoverable. It has many useful features such as
> > > categories, upvotes and indented thread view, which all makes
> organizing
> > > and discovering conversations easier. By moving casual conversations
> to a
> > > new forum, it also frees up GitHub Issues for actual TODOs and bug
> > reports
> > > so that committers can track work progress more efficiently.
> > > >
> > > > This email is a call for discussion/vote on whether we should enable
> > > this feature for Superset. Note that per Apache policy, such forum "can
> > > only be used for user help issues, all code-related discussions and
> > project
> > > management activities (will still) be reflected to an ASF mailing list"
> > > [1]. During the meetup, someone also raised the concern that this new
> > venue
> > > of conversations may split committer attention and lead to slower
> > > responses. But one may argue since developers already use GitHub
> > everyday,
> > > the attention may not split that much anyway. Other than that, I
> > personally
> > > don't see any major downside.
> > > >
> > > > Please feel free to voice your support or concerns one way or
> another.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Jesse
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20772 <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20772>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to