Hi all,
thanks to the infra team for resurrecting this activity, and thanks to
Pierre for pushing it forward.
I have re-added the infra ML in CC as the very next step - once the VM
will be available - is to gather some requirements and define plans: all
things for which - as any IdM consultant knows very well - we will need
a tight interaction with the committer, e.g. the infra team.
Please take care of double-posting any communication regarding this PoC
to both dev@syncope and users@infra, thanks.
Regards.
On 14/12/2016 18:51, Pierre Smits wrote:
Great news!!!
The IAM PoC is moving forward. Today a VM instance is being deployed, And
when that is done, the VM will be populated with the names of the VM
managers.
When this is done we can start working on the next step.
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
OFBiz based solutions & services
OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò <[email protected]
wrote:
On 09/12/2015 15:41, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
On 09/12/2015 15:34, Tony Stevenson wrote:
Agree: we'll need to ask other people that want to get involved to
subscribe infra@ as well, no problems.
I'd like to keep dev@syncope in CC for any discussion on the topic,
though.
We might use some fancy [Syncope-PoC] subject prefix as well.
As already briefly discussed via HipChat, I must admit I am not very
confident with Puppet - but we are actually doing two different things:
(1) implement what we call a IAM project, that is work on a Syncope
overlay - e.g. an actual Maven project whose sources need to be
versioned, which in turn requires a dev env, and will produce some
artifacts (WAR files actually)
(2) implement provisioning to ASF infrastructure of such WAR files
into Tomcat, with DBMS support
About the latter, it seems it is possible to have Jenkins pushing them
to bintray for deployment, and that .deb packaging is desirable - again,
no problems.
One of the objectives is clearly, once the actual development is over,
easily being able to move it to production, with few lines in puppet.
+1 to all of that.
Ok, so I'll wait some little more to see if there are other reaction,
then I'll fire up a JIRA ticket for the development VM.
It seems that Pierre has been faster, so we have
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10930
as "master" ticket and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10931
for development VM; I have also opened
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10933
for git repo.
Per watch the issue(s) above in order to stay in touch with progresses.
Regards.
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/
Member at The Apache Software Foundation
Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail
http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
