> Agree: we'll need to ask other people that want to get involved to > subscribe infra@ as well, no problems. > I'd like to keep dev@syncope in CC for any discussion on the topic, > though. > We might use some fancy [Syncope-PoC] subject prefix as well.
> As already briefly discussed via HipChat, I must admit I am not very > confident with Puppet - but we are actually doing two different things: > > (1) implement what we call a IAM project, that is work on a Syncope > overlay - e.g. an actual Maven project whose sources need to be > versioned, which in turn requires a dev env, and will produce some > artifacts (WAR files actually) > (2) implement provisioning to ASF infrastructure of such WAR files > into Tomcat, with DBMS support > > About the latter, it seems it is possible to have Jenkins pushing them > to bintray for deployment, and that .deb packaging is desirable - again, > no problems. > > One of the objectives is clearly, once the actual development is over, > easily being able to move it to production, with few likes in puppet. > +1 to all of that. -- Many thanks, -- Tony
