A big +1 for the abstraction layer. Sure, everybody is using jQuery now, but what in about a year or two? There is always a new "hot" thing around the corner, especially in JavaScript land.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for SPI. I think it wouldn't end up large, covering mostly DOM node > searching (Prototype's $$() and jQuery's $()), list processing (foreach) and > event binding. Howard, you're already working on the JavaScript rewriting, > so you're the right person to tell me if I'm right or not. :) > > > On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:28:21 -0200, Howard Lewis Ship <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> As much fun as I've been having with the JavaScript abstraction layer >> ... is it really needed? >> >> Could we please 90% (99% ?) of our users by providing jQuery out of >> the box, and coding the Tapestry support directly against it? >> >> How many people will care about the SPI? How many will stay on >> Prototype when jQuery is an option? How many will be desperate top >> use just MooTools. or just YUI, or just Dojo, and can't handle having >> anything else? >> >> Just want to explore all the options. >> > > > -- > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
