We don't have to reinvent the wheel for that one. We might simply look around and see how other frameworks are solving this. If we don't like what we see we can still do it differently but what works for others might also work for us.
Uli On 25.10.2012 23:28, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > As much fun as I've been having with the JavaScript abstraction layer > ... is it really needed? > > Could we please 90% (99% ?) of our users by providing jQuery out of > the box, and coding the Tapestry support directly against it? > > How many people will care about the SPI? How many will stay on > Prototype when jQuery is an option? How many will be desperate top > use just MooTools. or just YUI, or just Dojo, and can't handle having > anything else? > > Just want to explore all the options. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
