I'm working on a revised DateField right now, and driving it towards the
unobtrusive approach instead of the explicit approach.


On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Massimo Lusetti <mluse...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I modified the fiddle to loop 100 times; this will partially account for
> > cachine, and MV optimizations.  By the last round:
> >
> > idLookup: 2ms
> > dataLookup: 15ms
> >
> > Still, tiny amounts of time.
> >
>
> I would definitely prefer the attribute driver approach even in case of a
> need of a complete scan on each page or section.
>
> Said that I would ask if that time would increase with and increase in the
> complexity of the page? How many "fiddle" elements (maybe compared to id
> elements) could have a page like GMail ?
>
> One more think to note is: since more and more communities are going
> towards a "data-" like approach I think that that sentiment could drive the
> future developments of javascript frameworks and javascript engines.
>
> Cheers
> --
> Massimo
>



-- 
Howard M. Lewis Ship

Creator of Apache Tapestry

The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to
learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!

(971) 678-5210
http://howardlewisship.com

Reply via email to