BTW I've run the fiddle on my box several times and here are the average: idLookup took: 6ms, found:1000 dataLookup took: 8ms, found: 1000
Cheers On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm working on a revised DateField right now, and driving it towards the > unobtrusive approach instead of the explicit approach. > > > On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Massimo Lusetti <mluse...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > I modified the fiddle to loop 100 times; this will partially account for > > > cachine, and MV optimizations. By the last round: > > > > > > idLookup: 2ms > > > dataLookup: 15ms > > > > > > Still, tiny amounts of time. > > > > > > > I would definitely prefer the attribute driver approach even in case of a > > need of a complete scan on each page or section. > > > > Said that I would ask if that time would increase with and increase in > the > > complexity of the page? How many "fiddle" elements (maybe compared to id > > elements) could have a page like GMail ? > > > > One more think to note is: since more and more communities are going > > towards a "data-" like approach I think that that sentiment could drive > the > > future developments of javascript frameworks and javascript engines. > > > > Cheers > > -- > > Massimo > > > > > > -- > Howard M. Lewis Ship > > Creator of Apache Tapestry > > The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to > learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! > > (971) 678-5210 > http://howardlewisship.com > -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com
