Hi, Have you considered pure JavaScript based testing ? It is much faster than WebDriver based and much closer to the real world.
1. Blog - http://wicketinaction.com/2012/11/javascript-based-functional-testing/ 2. Tests - https://github.com/apache/wicket/tree/master/wicket-examples/src/main/webapp/js-test 3. Library - https://github.com/martin-g/gym.js On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Lenny Primak <lpri...@hope.nyc.ny.us>wrote: > I have never been able to get any selenium tapestry tests to run on my Mac > at all BTW. > Something has to do with firefiox version or something. > So, even the proverbial 'patch with tests' isn't possible for me. > I really don't mind the bleeding edge technology though. > > On Jul 31, 2013, at 9:10 AM, Ulrich Stärk <u...@spielviel.de> wrote: > > > One reason I haven't contributed much in terms of code for quite some > time is the ever changing > > technology stack Tapestry is built with. We have an increasingly complex > stack of bleeding-edge > > tools and technologies that I simply lack the time of keeping up with. > > > > I have the feeling that this might be a turn-down for other potential > contributors as well. I won't > > be against it but don't be surprised about continously declining > contributor activity. > > > > Uli > > > > > > On 30.07.2013 23:50, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > >> One thing I've been saying in some of the bugs I've been closing is my > >> desire to get out of the testing side of things. I have no desire to > >> maintain the existing TestNG, EasyMock, and Selenium support code ... > you > >> may have noticed that I'm a fan of Spock for unit and mock testing, and > Geb > >> for end-to-end integration testing. > >> > >> I'd love to scrap the existing tapestry-core tests and rewrite for Spock > >> and Geb, but (alas), that is a huge effort. But I would like to start > >> documenting in release notes and elsewhere that the path forward is to > >> invest in Spock and Geb. > >> > >> Ok ... as usual, since I've been thinking about this in the background > for > >> too long, my invitation to discuss sounds like a mandate ... but, > >> seriously, thoughts on this subject? > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org > >
