I'm open to anything and I'll try to look at your links. That being said, web applications are all about integration, and I just don't have confidence unless it is tested end-to-end using a real browser.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > Have you considered pure JavaScript based testing ? > It is much faster than WebDriver based and much closer to the real world. > > 1. Blog - > http://wicketinaction.com/2012/11/javascript-based-functional-testing/ > 2. Tests - > > https://github.com/apache/wicket/tree/master/wicket-examples/src/main/webapp/js-test > 3. Library - https://github.com/martin-g/gym.js > > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Lenny Primak <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > I have never been able to get any selenium tapestry tests to run on my > Mac > > at all BTW. > > Something has to do with firefiox version or something. > > So, even the proverbial 'patch with tests' isn't possible for me. > > I really don't mind the bleeding edge technology though. > > > > On Jul 31, 2013, at 9:10 AM, Ulrich Stärk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > One reason I haven't contributed much in terms of code for quite some > > time is the ever changing > > > technology stack Tapestry is built with. We have an increasingly > complex > > stack of bleeding-edge > > > tools and technologies that I simply lack the time of keeping up with. > > > > > > I have the feeling that this might be a turn-down for other potential > > contributors as well. I won't > > > be against it but don't be surprised about continously declining > > contributor activity. > > > > > > Uli > > > > > > > > > On 30.07.2013 23:50, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > > >> One thing I've been saying in some of the bugs I've been closing is my > > >> desire to get out of the testing side of things. I have no desire to > > >> maintain the existing TestNG, EasyMock, and Selenium support code ... > > you > > >> may have noticed that I'm a fan of Spock for unit and mock testing, > and > > Geb > > >> for end-to-end integration testing. > > >> > > >> I'd love to scrap the existing tapestry-core tests and rewrite for > Spock > > >> and Geb, but (alas), that is a huge effort. But I would like to start > > >> documenting in release notes and elsewhere that the path forward is to > > >> invest in Spock and Geb. > > >> > > >> Ok ... as usual, since I've been thinking about this in the background > > for > > >> too long, my invitation to discuss sounds like a mandate ... but, > > >> seriously, thoughts on this subject? > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! (971) 678-5210 http://howardlewisship.com
