The NOTICE file (in the Apache Taverna distribution, not inside taverna-beanshell-activity.jar ) is presumably a prominent label.
I think we have several CDDL dependencies from Java XML and so, they are also category-B. as long as they are JAR only then there is no "source confusion". Beanshell 2.0b4 (SPL/LGPL) we have only ever used it as a jar from Maven central. You need to go to beanshell.org to find the source code manually. On 8 Jan 2015 16:05, "Andy Seaborne" <a...@apache.org> wrote: > On 08/01/15 13:03, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > >> So for now then, the main thing would just be to include whatever >> NOTICE markings are required by the Sun Public License and use the >> 2.0b4 JAR as-is. >> > > It's not just NOTICE for category-B: > > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b > > """ > By attaching a prominent label to the distribution and *requiring an > explicit action by the user* to get the reciprocally-licensed source, users > are less likely to be unaware of restrictions significantly different from > those of the Apache License. > """ > > My emphasis. > > Taverna may end up with processes around cat-B stuff so unless something > else requires it as well, then avoiding now saves time in the long run and > is nicer to users. > > Andy > >
