+1 from me as well. Sounds good. On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Ted Wilmes <twil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It does for me too, +1. > > --Ted > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1. It does to me. > > Hadrian > > > > > > On 07/13/2016 04:29 PM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > > > >> Since we don't really follow semantic versioning for releases, I thought > >> we > >> should discuss the 3.1.x code line. We've been steadily adding features > >> right up to our current 3.1.3 release which we will vote on shortly. I > >> think it's pretty awesome that we've managed to maintain that older line > >> of > >> code for as long as we have and I think we've evolved it in a very > >> sensible > >> way. > >> > >> I think we should continue to maintain 3.1.x after the 3.1.3 release, > >> which > >> would mean a 3.1.4 release at some point, but we should strictly limit > the > >> changes there to bug fixes and not do any "new features" on that line of > >> code (i.e the tp31 branch). As it stands, I don't see any open "bugs" > for > >> the 3.1.3 in JIRA so as of right now, we wouldn't have much planned for > >> 3.1.4. > >> > >> Does that make sense for everyone? > >> > >> >
