Stephen, I noticed a couple of issues moved out of 3.1.4 for reason of bug fixes only. Typically the semantic versioning is limited to "public API". So I would argue that adding a service script (optional usage at that) and a tutorial (documentation) would not affect the public API or even general behavior of any of the components. Of course, how you interpret and apply semantic versioning is entirely up to you.
Are there any plans or thoughts on a support roadmap (when 3.1, 3.2 are EOL) and future release roadmap, timelines? On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> wrote: > It sounds like we have general consensus on going with 3.1.x for bug fixes > only. I've updated JIRA as such and moved issues around. I will mention > that while i was going through the release work for 3.1.3/3.2.1 I realized > that the minor exception to this rule of "bug fixes only" on the 3.1.x line > would be changes to the release process which I would hope we could keep as > similar as possible for as long as possible. I'd hate to have different > scripts/instructions for one version as opposed to another - that will not > make the job of release manager nice. > > Thanks, > > Stephen > > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 9:02 PM, Dylan Millikin <dylan.milli...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 from me as well. Sounds good. >> >> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Ted Wilmes <twil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > It does for me too, +1. >> > >> > --Ted >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > +1. It does to me. >> > > Hadrian >> > > >> > > >> > > On 07/13/2016 04:29 PM, Stephen Mallette wrote: >> > > >> > >> Since we don't really follow semantic versioning for releases, I >> thought >> > >> we >> > >> should discuss the 3.1.x code line. We've been steadily adding >> features >> > >> right up to our current 3.1.3 release which we will vote on shortly. I >> > >> think it's pretty awesome that we've managed to maintain that older >> line >> > >> of >> > >> code for as long as we have and I think we've evolved it in a very >> > >> sensible >> > >> way. >> > >> >> > >> I think we should continue to maintain 3.1.x after the 3.1.3 release, >> > >> which >> > >> would mean a 3.1.4 release at some point, but we should strictly limit >> > the >> > >> changes there to bug fixes and not do any "new features" on that line >> of >> > >> code (i.e the tp31 branch). As it stands, I don't see any open "bugs" >> > for >> > >> the 3.1.3 in JIRA so as of right now, we wouldn't have much planned >> for >> > >> 3.1.4. >> > >> >> > >> Does that make sense for everyone? >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> -- Robert Dale
