Hey, On 9/6/07, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Most of the comments were that it was too annoying to do for casual > bugfixing, and it's true it's not justified for all patches. Maybe a > finer rule could be devised, something like using a RtisTC (tis = the > important stuff) model. > > To give an idea, "tis" could mean: > - API changing patches (any protected or above signature change) > - code changes in the critical path (for example, code which gets > executed on each HTTP request) > - any other commit for which a committer asks for the RTC procedure > should be rollbacked if it hinders concurrent work, and go through the > RTC procedure
I like this, I think it's a great compromise. Yoav --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
