Mladen Turk wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
To give an idea, "tis" could mean:
- API changing patches (any protected or above signature change)
- code changes in the critical path (for example, code which gets
executed on each HTTP request)
Fine.
- any other commit for which a committer asks for the RTC procedure
should be rollbacked if it hinders concurrent work, and go through the
RTC procedure
This looks like a conditional veto that can be voted over. Perfect!
IIUC it means that instead veto one asks for a vote (+3 votes), right?
Looks like RTC on demand, that would require some sort of lazy consensus.
This could get clarified a little bit more. I don't think asking for
review is vetoing a patch, as there's no need to revert in most cases
(one case would be a pending tag, or if it somehow causes immediate
development conflicts). However, if a patch doesn't attract enough
votes, or doesn't pass the +3 margin (if that's what gets accepted), it
is considered vetoed and needs to be reverted.
Rémy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
