Mladen Turk wrote: > Mark Thomas wrote: >> Mladen Turk wrote: >>> The standard .zip distro should contain only the bare tomcat. >>> Everything else like docs, deployer etc are already in separate >>> packages. >>> The point is to have the same functionality as with .exe installer >>> but from individual peaces, just like you select which sections to >>> install from the installer. >> >> In which case the service component needs to be separate from the >> native/APR >> connector component. >> > > Well, it would be simpler to have just one platform/cpu dist for > 'everything-native' instead three more zips thought. > > > Just one note to the previous reply... > IMO the .zip distro should be exactly the same as .tar.gz distro
+1 > (I'm not even convinced we absolutely need CR-LF line endings). > The reason is that some platforms have limited default tar implementation > like Solaris (especially for long file names and paths). I see where you are coming from but I think the line ending changes should stay. > So, to find a common denominator, how about: > apache-tomcat-0.0.0.zip > > apache-tomcat-0.0.0-windows-x86.zip > apache-tomcat-0.0.0-windows-x64.zip > apache-tomcat-0.0.0-windows-i64.zip > The latest three would contain everything from > apache-tomcat-0.0.0.zip + service wrapper + native. +1. If we get feedback from users that suggests changes we can re-evaluate. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
