2012/2/29 Jeremy Boynes <jboy...@apache.org>: > Removed from svn. A dry run of the next release shows they are automatically > added to the source bundle. >
1. Where it takes those files from? Is their content correct. Besides extra blank lines before and after the text in NOTICE file, there is small difference: NOTICE: Copyright 2000-2012 The Apache Software Foundation NOTICE.txt: Copyright 2009-2012 The Apache Software Foundation Is <inceptionYear> in pom.xml correct (2000) ? 2. Looking at site.xml in source bundle and current site at http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/ - I do not see a link to http://www.apache.org/licenses/ - I do not see a link to http://tomcat.apache.org/security.html 3. commons-skin dependency says v.2. I see that there is v.3 at Maven Central. [x] +1 to go, but I think v2 will be needed before we release any of the taglibs. It is hard to judge without looking at a site generated from this parent pom. Best regards, Konstantin Kolinko > On Feb 28, 2012, at 12:12 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: > >> On 02/28/2012 08:57 PM, sebb wrote: >>> On 28 February 2012 16:43, Mladen Turk<mt...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Although not sure why you have LICENSE and LICENSE.txt as well >>>> as NOTICE and NOTICE.txt with the same content >>> >>> That is probably caused by the Apache POM, which tries to be helpful >>> by adding the N&L for you. >>> >> >> Right, that should be the cause. >> >>> We had to disable that part in Commons, because we don't use the same >>> naming convention (and the AP does not allow for the names to be >>> changed). >>> >> >> Whatever... Think that this should be easy to solve. >> Just rm extra files if maven will add them automatically >> and the content is satisfactory. >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
