Hi

I think we'll wait openjpa release (if i didnt miss it) to make it official
and push binaries on apache servers and repo1
Le 15 nov. 2013 20:39, "Alex The Rocker" <alex.m3...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> Hello,
>
> Looks like we are past 72 hours since the vote for TomEE 1.6.0 final has
> been launched.
>
> What's the next step ?
>
> How long is it before TomEE 1.6.0 final download link will be added to
> http://tomee.apache.org/downloads.html page?
>
> Thanks,
> Alex.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > +1
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >________________________________
> > > From: David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com>
> > >To: "dev@tomee.apache.org" <dev@tomee.apache.org>
> > >Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2013, 2:47
> > >Subject: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
> > >
> > >
> > >Ok!  All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting.
> > >
> > >I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0
> > binaries.  I ran these through the TCK and all is green.  Looks like
> we're
> > good to go.
> > >
> > >Maven Repo:
> > >
> > >-
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-120/
> > >
> > >Binaries:
> > >
> > >- https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-120/tomee-1.6.0/
> > >
> > >Tag:
> > >
> > >- https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/
> > >
> > >
> > >The vote will go for 72 hours.  Any -1s in this time will be seen as a
> > positive.  The vote will keep going even if a -1 happens so we can
> collect
> > all possible feedback and surface *all* issues.
> > >
> > >If we have to reroll and revote, we will fix all -1 issues and push new
> > binaries and start a new 72 hour vote.  If you didn't look at the first
> set
> > of binaries and feel compelled to vote -1, this will be seen as a
> > negative.  Consider offering each voter an hour per vote on a task of
> their
> > choosing to make up for their lost time. :)
> > >
> > >
> > >-David
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to