Technically its 72 hours is already up and there are no votes from the PMC. Just 3 non-binding +1s from us.
Did my best to encourage activity of any kind. If I don't see any by tomorrow, I might try spinning up some plan B binaries with OpenJPA pulled in. -David On Nov 16, 2013, at 10:16 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com> wrote: > Of course. > AFAIR, OpenJPA 2.3.0 is under vote currently, so it should be ok on Monday > or so. > > JLouis > > > 2013/11/16 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > >> @jl: we cant while openjpa vote didnt pass >> Le 16 nov. 2013 16:17, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <jeano...@gmail.com> a écrit >> : >> >>> David has been out the whole week to give talks to Devoxx BE. >>> As far as I know, I gonna get back late on Monday. >>> >>> If needed, I can follow the release process tomorrow or on Monday >> morning. >>> >>> JLouis >>> >>> >>> 2013/11/16 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> updated my test suite - works fine >>>> >>>> -Matthias >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> LieGrue, >>>>> strub >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>> From: David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> >>>>>> To: "dev@tomee.apache.org" <dev@tomee.apache.org> >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2013, 2:47 >>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting. >>>>>> >>>>>> I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0 >>>>> binaries. I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like >>>> we're >>>>> good to go. >>>>>> >>>>>> Maven Repo: >>>>>> >>>>>> - >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-120/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Binaries: >>>>>> >>>>>> - >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-120/tomee-1.6.0/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Tag: >>>>>> >>>>>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The vote will go for 72 hours. Any -1s in this time will be seen >> as a >>>>> positive. The vote will keep going even if a -1 happens so we can >>>> collect >>>>> all possible feedback and surface *all* issues. >>>>>> >>>>>> If we have to reroll and revote, we will fix all -1 issues and push >>> new >>>>> binaries and start a new 72 hour vote. If you didn't look at the >> first >>>> set >>>>> of binaries and feel compelled to vote -1, this will be seen as a >>>>> negative. Consider offering each voter an hour per vote on a task of >>>> their >>>>> choosing to make up for their lost time. :) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -David >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Louis >>> >> > > > > -- > Jean-Louis
