Of course.
AFAIR, OpenJPA 2.3.0 is under vote currently, so it should be ok on Monday
or so.

JLouis


2013/11/16 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>

> @jl: we cant while openjpa vote didnt pass
> Le 16 nov. 2013 16:17, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <jeano...@gmail.com> a écrit
> :
>
> > David has been out the whole week to give talks to Devoxx BE.
> > As far as I know, I gonna get back late on Monday.
> >
> > If needed, I can follow the release process tomorrow or on Monday
> morning.
> >
> > JLouis
> >
> >
> > 2013/11/16 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org>
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > updated my test suite - works fine
> > >
> > > -Matthias
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > LieGrue,
> > > > strub
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >________________________________
> > > > > From: David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com>
> > > > >To: "dev@tomee.apache.org" <dev@tomee.apache.org>
> > > > >Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2013, 2:47
> > > > >Subject: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >Ok!  All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting.
> > > > >
> > > > >I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0
> > > > binaries.  I ran these through the TCK and all is green.  Looks like
> > > we're
> > > > good to go.
> > > > >
> > > > >Maven Repo:
> > > > >
> > > > >-
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-120/
> > > > >
> > > > >Binaries:
> > > > >
> > > > >-
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-120/tomee-1.6.0/
> > > > >
> > > > >Tag:
> > > > >
> > > > >- https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >The vote will go for 72 hours.  Any -1s in this time will be seen
> as a
> > > > positive.  The vote will keep going even if a -1 happens so we can
> > > collect
> > > > all possible feedback and surface *all* issues.
> > > > >
> > > > >If we have to reroll and revote, we will fix all -1 issues and push
> > new
> > > > binaries and start a new 72 hour vote.  If you didn't look at the
> first
> > > set
> > > > of binaries and feel compelled to vote -1, this will be seen as a
> > > > negative.  Consider offering each voter an hour per vote on a task of
> > > their
> > > > choosing to make up for their lost time. :)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >-David
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Louis
> >
>



-- 
Jean-Louis

Reply via email to